Re: [Hawkular-dev] Hawkular.org

Thanks for the comments, I'm really looking more for feedback on the organization of the content, all the content is taken from the existing. For the 3rd point, the current website has 2 very similar pages (I only conserved one here as it was a quick shot, but the 2 needs to be merged) http://www.hawkular.org/community/index.html http://www.hawkular.org/community/join.html On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Alissa Bonas <abonas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Couple of suggestions: > > 1. In the "Hawkular features" section in homepage make the icons > clickable. right now the only way to get more info is to click the "more" > part. > 2. Top level menu font color is a really pale grey so everything looks > disabled. > 3. Community-Connect leads to page named "Join". Perhaps it would more > clear to make the link and the page name the same (and I would call it "Get > involved" anyway) > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Heute <theute(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> So here is a very rough idea of how it would look like: >> http://209.132.178.114:10188/ >> >> Content need to be adapted, new pages to be created, but hopefully you >> get the idea >> >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:27 PM, John Sanda <jsanda(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 5, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Thomas Segismont <tsegismo(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 05/07/2016 à 16:05, Stefan Negrea a écrit : >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Thomas Segismont <tsegismo(a)redhat.com >>> <mailto:tsegismo@redhat.com <tsegismo(a)redhat.com&gt;&gt;&gt; wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 05/07/2016 à 14:59, Heiko W.Rupp a écrit : >>> >>> 2) The Grafana plugin should be moved under Metrics because is for >>> Metrics >>> >>> and only Metrics. >>> >>> If this is true - can we make it work with H-services as well? >>> >>> >>> The Grafana plugin works with all active flavors of Metrics: >>> standalone, >>> Openshift-Metrics and Hawkular-Services. >>> >>> I'm not sure what Stefan meant. >>> >>> >>> The Grafana plugins works with Metrics deployed on all distributions >>> however, the plugin itself can only be used with the Metrics project, >>> there are no projects (such as Alerts, or Inventory) that will ever >>> integrate with it. That is why I think it should be under the Metrics >>> project and not in another place. The integration itself is very >>> specific to just Metrics, not the entire Hawkular Services. >>> >>> >>> I see what you meant now. But we can't presume anything about other >>> services roadmaps. For example, the datasource plugin annotation feature >>> >>> could be implemented with requests to an event service. >>> >>> Anyway, since it should be able to connect to Metrics in different >>> environments (H-Services, OS-Metrics and standalone), I err on the side >>> >>> of promoting it as a top level project. >>> >>> >>> I think a top-level project makes the most sense. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> hawkular-dev mailing list >>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hawkular-dev mailing list >> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > > _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev