Re: [Hawkular-dev] Mocking HTTP(S) Server
Hello,
this looks like an elegant solution. One check with Wireshark just to be double-sure would
not be bad but it is likely to confirm you are correct ;-)
@M.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Palaga" <ppalaga(a)redhat.com>
To: "Martin Vecera" <mvecera(a)redhat.com>, hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 10:25:12 AM
Subject: Re: Mocking HTTP(S) Server
Ahoj Martine, thanks for the info. More inline...
On 2015-06-06 00:04, Martin Vecera wrote:
Hello Peter,
do you have an idea when did that happen? The site is up and running.
We do not have any plans to shut it down or do any maintenance mode.
It might be that the response took too long.
I do not remember if I was getting timeouts or something else.
Nevertheless, a fix based on wiremock is in place now:
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular/commit/d4d7012f2c68a69d17619aea6a9b4...
Nevertheless, there was a very good reason why I used this site in
your unit tests. Every other mock/test site I used was allowed to use
HTTP as a backup. So even if I asked for HTTPS, if I refused the
certificate, the test passed. So make sure you update the test to
check that this is not happening.
If I refuse all certs by returning false here
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular/blob/1d8fd2bc06ed3893e4e3bad0c828983...
the SSL test fails. That is a proof that wiremock is not doing the HTTPS
fallback to HTTP, is it not?
-- P
Regards, Martin
P.S.: Please CC me, I am not subscribed to your list.
> Hi *,
>
> it happened today: http://perfcake.org/ - one of the sites we
> unit-test Pinger against is down and therefore the tests are
> failing.
>
> Can anybody recommend a solution for mocking an HTTP Server?
>
> http://wiremock.org/ is the first result on Google and I am going
> to have a look at it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
-- Martin Večeřa Middleware QE Manager External no. +420 532 294 112
Internal no. 8262112 IRC: mvecera #brno #jbossqa
Calendar:
https://www.google.com/calendar/b/1/embed?src=mvecera@redhat.com&ctz=...