Re: [Hawkular-dev] Proposal: introduce DependencyConvergence enforcer rule
Le 25/11/2015 10:04, Peter Palaga a écrit :
On 2015-11-25 09:18, Thomas Segismont wrote:
> >I'm fine with adding the rule as long as it's possible to deactivate it
> >at the module level if needed (with serious justification).
I am frankly failing to conceive of an acceptable justification to
disable the rule for some module.
So am I. But more often than not rules need exceptions.
I think that the only legal way to fix any violations of the rule
should
be to exclude one of the conflicting artifacts (with all the known
pitfalls - seehttp://stackoverflow.com/a/16239482 )
I agree, properly excluding the conflicting dependency is the right move
for this type of problem.