Re: [Hawkular-dev] Tag concept in metrics and alerts

Not using the same terminology as "industry standards" is a problem, not using the same terminology within Hawkular small world is another... Can we solve both ? Thomas On 06/24/2015 12:25 PM, Michael Burman wrote: > Hi, > > I don't agree with changing the terms. Many of metrics competing products > (such as InfluxDB / OpenTSDB) use the same terminology, so it is easier > for customers to understand the differences and similarities between > products. Using different terminology was one of the difficulties in RHQ > (like noted in the F2F meeting) and I don't think we should repeat the > same mistake. > > - Micke > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary Brown" <gbrown(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Discussions around Hawkular development" > <hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 11:45:56 AM > Subject: [Hawkular-dev] Tag concept in metrics and alerts > > Hi > > Both metrics and alerts use the term 'tag' - however metrics use a > name/value pair for a tag, and alerts uses it as a label. Wondering > whether we need consistency? > > When I hear the term tag, I usually envisage a label - e.g. as in git. So > wondering whether it would be clearer for metrics to rename tags to > properties? > > Possibly metrics needs the concept of a tag/label as well? > > Regards > Gary > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev