Re: [Hawkular-dev] Hawkular.org

On 16 Jun 2016, at 15:33, Stefan Negrea wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Gary Brown <gbrown(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> I think the structure is ok, but prefer having Downloads and Documentation >> at the top level. But instead of the previous structure, still organise >> based on package, so: >> > > There is no point having top level Downloads and Documentation if > everything is sectioned the way Thomas proposed in the last email. There And then as user having to navigate separate trees to get e.g. to the downloads section of hawkular-services and the Go client is also confusing. Personally I'd like to see one top level of downloads or even downloads+docs | Project | Docs | Download latest |-----------------|-----------|---------------| | hawkular-services | docs/hs/.. | v0.0.5 | | go client | docs/go/.. | v 0.0.3 | With docs + downloads being hyperlinked

Individual subtrees could even link to this table for their downloads (but directly link to the target docs) _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev