Re: [Hawkular-dev] Coming to Parent: publishing JavaDoc and sources via Maven

On 2015-04-28 13:50, Lukas Krejci wrote: > What about IDE support for Asciidoc docs? Me, I like being able to click on > links in javadoc popups. +1 for the question about the IDE support. Jared, do you know how does it work in Eclipse & Co? Regardless of the above, I do not see the need to introduce asciidoclet. There is very little plain HTML in typical good JavaDoc and this small amount is not worth the trouble, IMO. -- P > On Monday, April 27, 2015 20:38:47 Jared MORGAN wrote: >> I'm coming late to the party here, so my apologies for that. >> >> I understand that docs for Hawkular will be done in Asciidoc (great move >> IMHO). >> >> Why not extend that to Javadocs: https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoclet >> >> Compatible with Maven. No need to try and kludge HTML to make tables work. >> Easy to read directly in code as well as looking pretty when compiled. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> J >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >>>> Hi Jay, there is just a couple of them in Bus - see the attached file. >>>> -- P >>> If everyone writes as good as javadocs as I do, I'm all for the javadoc >>> checker :-D >>> _______________________________________________ >>> hawkular-dev mailing list >>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> hawkular-dev mailing list >> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev