Re: [Hawkular-dev] open shift agent - what to call it?
+1 on the format and hawkular/hawkular-wildfly-agent (renaming sucks but
we're still young enough to allow this)
But we still need to decide betwen Openshift vs Kubernetes.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Heiko W.Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 19 Oct 2016, at 15:24, John Mazzitelli wrote:
> OK, so if we use Hawkular Kubernetes Agent then the gitrepo would be
named:
>
> hawkular/hawkular-kubernetes-agent
Sounds good to me
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.2 KB)