On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Matt Wringe <mwringe(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Mazzitelli" <mazz(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Discussions around Hawkular development" <
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:28:03 AM
> Subject: [Hawkular-dev] using hawkular wildfly agent as a custom java
agent
>
> This is for Matt, but figured post here for public consumption.
>
> The question was asked yesterday, "Can we use the Hawkular WildFly Agent
to
> monitor other things other than WildFly?"
My question should have been more:
"Do we have plans to have other Agents than just the WildFly one"
We have not discussed it because all of our efforts are around Wildly for
now, but we will need an agent for Fuse at some point. IDK if a jolokia is
the right answer for that platform or not.
For me, being able to gather metrics from a WildFly server is really
awesome, but when I am dealing with multiple systems I am going to want to
be able to manage all those metrics in the same place.
Currently its possible for a user to custom write their own component to
interface with the Hawkular Metrics server, but in this case it seems like
we are asking all our users to continuously write their own agents. Which
is not very user friendly and causes a bunch of duplication of effort.
It would be awesome to be able to provide more agents that would be simple
to setup and configure for different systems.
If I am mostly running a bunch of different Java application, including
WildFly, its going to be really tough to convince me to use Hawkular if its
only going to monitor a subset of my systems. I would be much better off
using Jolokia or something similar which can monitor all or most of my
applications.
>
> I gave one answer, but forgot there is a second alternative.
>
> ====
>
> The first answer that I gave is that you can use the Hawkular Wildfly
Agent
> to collect JMX data via Jolokia interface. There is an integration in the
> agent that lets you define your resource and metric metadata and your
> JMX/Jolokia servers. As an example, see here:
>
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-agent/blob/b52529823ca3c54d0b8b4aa56...
>
> You define where your JMX servers are via the <remote-jmx> managed server
> like this:
>
> <remote-jmx name="Remote JMX" enabled="false"
> resourceTypeSets="MainJMX,MemoryPoolJMX"
> url="http://localhost:8080/jolokia-war"/>
>
> OK, that's the JMX integration. Maybe useful, maybe not. But I mention it
> just in case.
Having the agent running in an EAP instance be able to monitor other
jolokia end points is cool. But I don't really understand why this isn't a
more standalone java application. I would think it would be much more
useful to be able to have a standalone java agent which could run on the
same system which is exposing the jolokia endpoint. Say I am only running
Tomcat servers and I don't want to run Wildfly just to be able to gather
the metrics from Tomcat.
> ====
>
> The second alternative I forgot to mention was the ability for any
component
> running in WildFly to obtain a Hawkular Agent proxy via JNDI and use that
> proxy that store inventory and metrics into the Hawkular Server.
>
> There is an example WAR module in the agent git repo that demonstrates
how to
> obtain the proxy via JNDI and how to store inventory and metrics - see
here:
>
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-agent/tree/master/hawkular-wildfly-a...
>
> This is just a simple WAR with a servlet. But it shows how a component
can
> get the agent proxy via JNDI here:
>
>
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-agent/blob/master/hawkular-wildfly-a...
>
> Here's code that shows the servlet doing things like sending metrics,
avail,
> and creating resources:
>
>
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-agent/blob/master/hawkular-wildfly-a...
>
> No one is using this yet. So there may be issues I am not aware of, but
we
> have integration tests that show this working.
>
> This was put together with the anticipation of someone asking for this
> capability - that is, "can the agent be used to collect metrics for other
> things other than WildFly". Essentially, this just gives you a skeleton
Java
> agent that you can extend to collect your own metrics and inventory. So
you
> can write a WAR or EAR, deploy it in any WildFly that has an agent
> subsystem, and your EAR/WAR can be used as an "agent" for your custom
stuff.
>
> Again, maybe useful, maybe not. But I mention it just in case.
Being able to expose custom metrics is extremely important. Awesome that
we have the ability to do that with the agent currently :)
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev