12:08 p.m.
Heiko,
Thank you for all of the help on IRC - just in case anyone else runs into
this, I was using :
jdk1.8.0_31.jdk and rvm 1.28.0
I upgraded my Java to jdk1.8.0_111.jdk and downgraded rvm to 1.27.0, and
ran through the steps that Heiko outlined above (wipe and reinstall jruby),
and that fixed everything.
Thanks again for the help.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Cunningham <tcunning(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Hmm... I tried your series of steps, and bundle install seems to
be
pulling in jrubyfx-1.2 for me :
lilguylaptop:hawkfx cunningt$ rvm --version
rvm 1.28.0 (latest) by Wayne E. Seguin <wayneeseguin(a)gmail.com>, Michal
Papis <mpapis(a)gmail.com> [https://rvm.io/]
bundle install output : https://gist.github.com/cunningt/
a6c018e5e38fff61110a1e1d1a1bf6ad
However, if I remove jrubyfx-1.2, and install jrubyfx-1.1.1, and bundle
install, I'm seeing :
lilguylaptop:hawkfx cunningt$ jruby -G -S hawkfx.rb
/Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-
fxmlloader-0.4.1-java/lib/fxmlloader/elts.rb:158: warning: `<<' after
local variable or literal is interpreted as binary operator
/Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-
fxmlloader-0.4.1-java/lib/fxmlloader/elts.rb:158: warning: even though it
seems like here document
Exception running Application:
#<NameError: uninitialized constant ValueElement::Logging
Did you mean? Logger>
org/jruby/RubyModule.java:3346:in `const_missing'
/Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-
fxmlloader-0.4.1-java/lib/fxmlloader/value_elts.rb:149:in `processValue'
/Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-
fxmlloader-0.4.1-java/lib/fxmlloader/value_elts.rb:67:in
`processStartElement'
/Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-
fxmlloader-0.4.1-java/lib/jrubyfx-fxmlloader.rb:440:in
`processStartElement'
/Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-
fxmlloader-0.4.1-java/lib/jrubyfx-fxmlloader.rb:351:in `load'
/Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-1.
1.1-java/lib/jrubyfx/controller.rb:123:in `load_into'
/Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-1.
1.1-java/lib/jrubyfx/core_ext/stage.rb:82:in `fxml'
hawkfx.rb:18:in `block in start'
org/jruby/RubyBasicObject.java:1667:in `instance_eval'
/Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-1.
1.1-java/lib/jrubyfx/module.rb:49:in `with'
hawkfx.rb:17:in `start'
/Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-1.
1.1-java/lib/jrubyfx/java_fx_impl.rb:119:in `block in
launch_app_after_platform'
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Heiko W.Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey Thomas,
>
> On 3 Jan 2017, at 15:20, Thomas Cunningham wrote:
>
> > lilguylaptop:hawkfx cunningt$ jruby -G -S hawkfx.rb
> >
> > /Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-fxmlloa
> der-0.4.1-java/lib/fxmlloader/elts.rb:158:
> > warning: `<<' after local variable or literal is interpreted as
binary
> > operator
> >
> > /Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-fxmlloa
> der-0.4.1-java/lib/fxmlloader/elts.rb:158:
> > warning: even though it seems like here document
>
> Those two are harmless.
>
> >
> > Exception running Application:
> >
> > #<NameError: uninitialized constant ValueElement::Logging
> >
> > Did you mean? Logger>
>
> I haven't seen that before
>
> > /Users/cunningt/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-1.2.0-
> java/lib/jrubyfx/controller.rb:129:in
> > `load_into'
>
> I see that you are using JrubyFx 1.2, while I am still on 1.1.1
> I did not even know that 1.2 is out.
>
> I did just wipe jruby-9.1.5.0 (rvm remove jruby-9.1.5.0) and then
>
> $ rvm install jruby-9.1.5.0
> $ rvm use jruby-9.1.5.0
> $ gem install bundler
> $ cd hawkfx
> $ bundle install
>
> and it pulled in jrubyfx-1.1.1
>
> and it starts like this
>
> snert:hawkfx hrupp$ jruby -G -S hawkfx.rb
> /Users/hrupp/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-fxmlloader
> -0.4.1-java/lib/fxmlloader/elts.rb:158:
> warning: `<<' after local variable or literal is interpreted as binary
> operator
> /Users/hrupp/.rvm/gems/jruby-9.1.5.0/gems/jrubyfx-fxmlloader
> -0.4.1-java/lib/fxmlloader/elts.rb:158:
> warning: even though it seems like here document
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>