This is exactly what we have in mind as well as wild cards, e.g., btm_id=<some unique
id for the transaction instance>, service_type=<service associated with metric>,
operation=*
On Jun 24, 2015, at 7:51 AM, Gary Brown <gbrown(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Hi John
Thanks for the clarification - that fits with how I need to use metrics. So for example,
I may have btm_id=<some unique id for the transaction instance>, and possibly
service_type=<service associated with the metric>, operation=<op name> - so
assume they would all be ok?
Regards
Gary
----- Original Message -----
> Originally tags were implemented just as a label, not a key/value pair. I saw
> that a number of other time series dbs use key/value pairs and decided to
> make the change. It can also produce more efficient queries. For example,
> filtering against N labels would require querying N partitions (in the
> original schema). Querying against one tag name with N different values
> however would only require querying 1 partition.
>
>> On Jun 24, 2015, at 6:25 AM, Michael Burman <miburman(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't agree with changing the terms. Many of metrics competing products
>> (such as InfluxDB / OpenTSDB) use the same terminology, so it is easier
>> for customers to understand the differences and similarities between
>> products. Using different terminology was one of the difficulties in RHQ
>> (like noted in the F2F meeting) and I don't think we should repeat the
>> same mistake.
>>
>> - Micke
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Gary Brown" <gbrown(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Discussions around Hawkular development"
>> <hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 11:45:56 AM
>> Subject: [Hawkular-dev] Tag concept in metrics and alerts
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Both metrics and alerts use the term 'tag' - however metrics use a
>> name/value pair for a tag, and alerts uses it as a label. Wondering
>> whether we need consistency?
>>
>> When I hear the term tag, I usually envisage a label - e.g. as in git. So
>> wondering whether it would be clearer for metrics to rename tags to
>> properties?
>>
>> Possibly metrics needs the concept of a tag/label as well?
>>
>> Regards
>> Gary
>> _______________________________________________
>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev