On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Joel Takvorian <jtakvori(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Heiko Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I think though that the removal of Hawkular Services is wrong.
> It may indeed at the moment only exist for that one consumer,
> which is ManageIQ, but not listing it is in my opinion also
> confusing. Instead of removing it, we should perhaps better
> educate visitors of the web site (in a graphical way?) how this
> relates to the other projects.
>
I'm sure we have stats on what people downloads the most... is it
metrics/alerts standalone, or services? We could take it in consideration.
Having it removed from the menu really makes things clearer, I think, but
on the other hand we could find ways not to make it completely off the
radars. For instance, adding something at the top of metrics/alerts install
page: "Looking for integrated metrics + alerting? Check out Hawkular
Services".
Another thing about services disappearing: the shame is that IMO it
currently has a better-written doc than metrics (the quickstart guide is
good, the installation guide is better than metric's simple link to github).
I agree that we should not lose the content from Hawkular Services. How
about renaming Hawkular Clients to Integrations and feature at the top of
the page the MiQ and OpenShift integrations? As far as updating the Metrics
and Alerting content, that is going to come after the cleanup.
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev