Re: [Hawkular-dev] httpclient vs okhhttp vs other

HttpAsyncClient should not be used, it hasn't been updated after 2011 and uses a very old version of HttpClient. - Micke On 04.02.2015 12:33, Thomas Segismont wrote: > +1 for Apache Http Client and Async Http client. > > It's just a BOM managed dependency declaration. It doesn't mean that we > can't use something if there's a good reason to do so (it does mean we > won't use 5 different versions of the tool). > > > Le 03/02/2015 16:44, Heiko Braun a écrit : >> >> +1 for apache http client >> >> >>> On 03 Feb 2015, at 16:24, Juraci Paixão Kröhling >>> <jpkroehling(a)redhat.com <mailto:jpkroehling@redhat.com>> wrote: >>> >>> I'm for a mature library. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hawkular-dev mailing list >> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev