On Oct 7, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Jay Shaughnessy
<jshaughn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
no objection from me.
On 10/7/2016 12:17 PM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> Hey,
>
> ManageIQ is using Ruby 2.2.4+ and Ruby 2.0 is
> pretty old now (Jruby 9.1.x is Ruby 2.3+), so
> I would like to no longer "support" Ruby 2.0.
> For the time being that only means that
> we do not test against 2.0 anymore in Travis.
>
> What do people think?
Yes! No need for these older versions.
>
> What about 2.1 ?
Why stop there? Why not 2.2? Since current version is 2.3
(which ships in Red Hat Software Collections).
>
> Heiko
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev>
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev