Loggers unlike printlns offer some control over topics to log and their
individual verbosities. In other words it is possible to turn on
detailed logging for a test that makes problems, and turn off all
others. -- P
On 2016-01-27 15:05, Thomas Segismont wrote:
I don't know the motivation of the JIRA, but as far as I'm
concerned, I
prefer usage of loggers so that I can have tests verbose in CI but quiet
locally.
Le 27/01/2016 14:58, Juraci Paixão Kröhling a écrit :
> Good question. In general, I quite like when tests write some debugging
> information to stdout/stderr , so that tools like Jenkins can record the
> output that each specific test had.
>
> - Juca.
>
> On 27.01.2016 14:55, Jay Shaughnessy wrote:
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, i'm not against a change, but what is the reason
>> to not have printlns, the jira just says "should not have" and
doesn't
>> state the misfortune that befalls their use.
>>
>> On 1/27/2016 4:44 AM, Peter Palaga wrote:
>>> Hi *,
>>>
>>> Short version: How to configure the log levels for individual
>>> jboss.logging loggers in tests run by maven outside the container?
>>>
>>> Long version:
>>> I was recently
assignedhttps://issues.jboss.org/browse/HAWKULAR-264 Add
>>> println checks to the checkstyle. It says that "Tests shouldn't be
>>> allowed to have printlns, we should enforce this via the checkstyle
plugin."
>>>
>>> I fully agree for tests being run on the server side - those can use
>>> JBoss Logging in the very same manner as the server code.
>>>
>>> However, what is the best replacement for println()s in tests that are
>>> run outside the server?
>>>
>>> I tried using JBoss Logging there too but I failed completely to find a
>>> way to configure the log levels for individual loggers. Does anybody
>>> know how to do that?
>>>
>>> To get my work done without using printlns, I started to use
>>> java.util.logging configured via logging.properties :
>>>
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-agent/blob/master/hawkular-wildfly-a...
>>>
>>> So what should be the replacement for printlns in tests?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev