Re: [Hawkular-dev] What should be the replacement for printlns in tests?

Hi *, Short version: How to configure the log levels for individual jboss.logging loggers in tests run by maven outside the container? Long version: I was recently assigned https://issues.jboss.org/browse/HAWKULAR-264 Add println checks to the checkstyle. It says that "Tests shouldn't be allowed to have printlns, we should enforce this via the checkstyle plugin." I fully agree for tests being run on the server side - those can use JBoss Logging in the very same manner as the server code. However, what is the best replacement for println()s in tests that are run outside the server? I tried using JBoss Logging there too but I failed completely to find a way to configure the log levels for individual loggers. Does anybody know how to do that? To get my work done without using printlns, I started to use java.util.logging configured via logging.properties : https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-agent/blob/master/hawkular-wildfly-a... So what should be the replacement for printlns in tests? Thanks, Peter _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev