If we decided option 2 (i.e. business txn support also above zipkin) then that would have
to be the approach.
I suppose the compromise would be, for opentracing we incorporate it within the provider -
but enable the 'business txn processing' module to also be used directly by zipkin
instrumented application.
Regards
Gary
----- Original Message -----
On 09/14/2016 11:41 AM, Gary Brown wrote:
> Only reason for discussing 2 is if we feel that it is going to be important
> to support business transaction capabilities above zipkin clients in the
> future.
Is it possible/feasible to provide something in the format of Hibernate?
Like, support for standards whenever possible, but "proprietary"
extensions are available and play nice with the standard-compliant API.
- Juca.
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev