1:16 p.m.
Hi *,
The new version 38 [1] brings just two minor changes:
* upgrade to hawkular-build-tools 15 that now contans apidoc.groovy [3]
script for generating REST API documentation from swagger by Pavol.
* Move gmavenplus-plugin executions to a dedicated profile so that it is
not active by default and the build can run faster for all projects
which do not contain any Groovy code [4]. Projects that contain Groovy
code will have to activate the plugin by adding
<groovy.test>true</groovy.test>
to their properties.
Note that the previous Parent version 37 contained upgrades to Cassandra
3.3 and Driver 3.0.0. It looks like no component upgraded to v37 yet.
I have a PR [5] ready that upgrades to Parent 38 and c* 3.3 in Commons.
According to Juca, no major problems are expected in Accounts, while it
is fully unclear if Titan will be ready to work with c* 3.3 in Inventory.
Best,
Peter
[1] https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-parent-pom/commits/38
[2] https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-parent-pom/commits/37
[3]
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-build-tools/commit/ec64970d15821d2d9...
[4]
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-parent-pom/commit/72381084614a5dde95...
[5] https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-commons/pull/53
1:45 p.m.
On 10 Mar 2016, at 13:16, Peter Palaga wrote:
Note that the previous Parent version 37 contained upgrades to
Cassandra
3.3 and Driver 3.0.0. It looks like no component upgraded to v37 yet.
Question - should we try to directly jump to 3.4, as it adds some
secondary indexes for text search (iirc) something we may want
to have sooner and later and we would skip one (schema) update
cycle that way?
But of course John Sanda needs to tell if that jump is feasible at all.
Heiko
2:47 p.m.
Hi Heiko, inline...
On 2016-03-10 13:45, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
On 10 Mar 2016, at 13:16, Peter Palaga wrote:
> Note that the previous Parent version 37 contained upgrades to Cassandra
> 3.3 and Driver 3.0.0. It looks like no component upgraded to v37 yet.
Question - should we try to directly jump to 3.4
I wanted to wait for jsanda with that question. -- P
, as it adds some
secondary indexes for text search (iirc) something we may want
to have sooner and later and we would skip one (schema) update
cycle that way?
But of course John Sanda needs to tell if that jump is feasible at all.
Heiko
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
3:01 p.m.
Hi,
*That apidoc.groovy is originally from Metrics and reused in Inventory and
Datamining.
I will submit PR to use it directly from build-tools.
Pavol
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Peter Palaga <ppalaga(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Heiko, inline...
On 2016-03-10 13:45, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> On 10 Mar 2016, at 13:16, Peter Palaga wrote:
>
>> Note that the previous Parent version 37 contained upgrades to Cassandra
>> 3.3 and Driver 3.0.0. It looks like no component upgraded to v37 yet.
>
> Question - should we try to directly jump to 3.4
I wanted to wait for jsanda with that question. -- P
> , as it adds some
> secondary indexes for text search (iirc) something we may want
> to have sooner and later and we would skip one (schema) update
> cycle that way?
>
> But of course John Sanda needs to tell if that jump is feasible at all.
>
> Heiko
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
3:10 p.m.
Le 10/03/2016 15:01, Pavol Loffay a écrit :
Hi,
*That apidoc.groovy is originally from Metrics and reused in Inventory
Thanks Pavol ;-)
and Datamining.
I will submit PR to use it directly from build-tools.
It is great to share it. Can you please make sure that the mechanism
used to inject a static Asciidoc header still works after your changes?
Pavol
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Peter Palaga <ppalaga(a)redhat.com
<mailto:ppalaga@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi Heiko, inline...
On 2016-03-10 13:45, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> On 10 Mar 2016, at 13:16, Peter Palaga wrote:
>
>> Note that the previous Parent version 37 contained upgrades to Cassandra
>> 3.3 and Driver 3.0.0. It looks like no component upgraded to v37 yet.
>
> Question - should we try to directly jump to 3.4
I wanted to wait for jsanda with that question. -- P
> , as it adds some
> secondary indexes for text search (iirc) something we may want
> to have sooner and later and we would skip one (schema) update
> cycle that way?
>
> But of course John Sanda needs to tell if that jump is feasible
at all.
>
> Heiko
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
3:18 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Thomas Segismont <tsegismo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Le 10/03/2016 15:01, Pavol Loffay a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> *That apidoc.groovy is originally from Metrics and reused in Inventory
Thanks Pavol ;-)
> and Datamining.
> I will submit PR to use it directly from build-tools.
>
It is great to share it. Can you please make sure that the mechanism
used to inject a static Asciidoc header still works after your changes?
Yes, I will check it.
>
> Pavol
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Peter Palaga <ppalaga(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:ppalaga@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Heiko, inline...
>
> On 2016-03-10 13:45, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> > On 10 Mar 2016, at 13:16, Peter Palaga wrote:
> >
> >> Note that the previous Parent version 37 contained upgrades to
Cassandra
> >> 3.3 and Driver 3.0.0. It looks like no component upgraded to v37
yet.
> >
> > Question - should we try to directly jump to 3.4
>
> I wanted to wait for jsanda with that question. -- P
>
> > , as it adds some
> > secondary indexes for text search (iirc) something we may want
> > to have sooner and later and we would skip one (schema) update
> > cycle that way?
> >
> > But of course John Sanda needs to tell if that jump is feasible
> at all.
> >
> > Heiko
> > _______________________________________________
> > hawkular-dev mailing list
> > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
3:01 p.m.
Hi,
Yes, we should jump directly to 3.4 after waiting for a moment to see if the release is
viable (Cassandra project has released a couple of DOA releases in the past). The SASI
indexes are something we have use for in the query-language department.
- Micke
----- Original Message -----
From: "Heiko W.Rupp" <hrupp(a)redhat.com>
To: "Discussions around Hawkular development"
<hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 2:45:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Hawkular-dev] Hawkular Parent 38
On 10 Mar 2016, at 13:16, Peter Palaga wrote:
Note that the previous Parent version 37 contained upgrades to
Cassandra
3.3 and Driver 3.0.0. It looks like no component upgraded to v37 yet.
Question - should we try to directly jump to 3.4, as it adds some
secondary indexes for text search (iirc) something we may want
to have sooner and later and we would skip one (schema) update
cycle that way?
But of course John Sanda needs to tell if that jump is feasible at all.
Heiko
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
3248
days inactive
3248
days old
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Heiko W.Rupp -
Michael Burman -
Pavol Loffay -
Peter Palaga -
Thomas Segismont