]
Gail Badner commented on HHH-5368:
----------------------------------
Does this happen using 3.5.2?
Not throwing Optimistic Lock when the entity is attached
--------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-5368
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-5368
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.4.sp1
Environment: windows XP, jboss 4.3 EAP, hibernate 3.4.2.sp1
Reporter: Fernando Rubbo
Priority: Minor
Hi
Hibernate is not throwing Optimistic Lock when the entity is attached. It happens when
the business rule sets a version in the attached entity that is less than its original
(from database) version value.
Take the following code as an example of the bug.
// inserts A
A a1 = new A();
a1.setName("A1");
dao.persist(a1);
dao.flush();
dao.clear();
// as expected, the piece of code below works just fine
final A a2 = dao.find(A.class, new BigDecimal(1));
a2.setName("A2");
dao.merge(a2);
dao.flush();
dao.clear();
// as expected, this code fails due to Optimistic Lock
try{
final A a3 = dao.find(A.class, new BigDecimal(1));
dao.clear();
a3.setName("A3");
a3.setVersion(0); //database verison is 1
dao.merge(a3);
dao.flush();
Assert.fail();
}catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e.getMessage());
// ignore
}finally{
dao.clear();
}
// unexpectedly, the piece of code below also works..
// even with the version being less than the one in the database
// Note that this happens because hibernate is holding internaly the original
version of the entity.
// Even when the version is manually changed it keeps using the original one.
final A a3 = dao.find(A.class, new BigDecimal(1));
a3.setName("A3");
a3.setVersion(0); //database verison is 1
dao.merge(a3);
dao.flush();
dao.clear();
This problem can be handled by the business rule. For example, whether the version that
comes from the screen is smaller than the one from the database it could throw an
Optimistic Lock exception. However, it it was not handled, hibernate must take care of
this in the same way it does with detached objects.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: