[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7996) ClusterTopologyManagerTest.testAbruptLeaveAfterGetStatus2[SCATTERED_SYNC, tx=false] random failures
by Dan Berindei (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Dan Berindei commented on ISPN-7996:
------------------------------------
Random failures in {{RehashWithSharedStoreTest.testRehashes\[SCATTERED_SYNC, tx=false, numOwners=1, l1=false\]}} probably have the same cause:
{noformat}
11:47:55,248 ERROR (transport-thread-Test-NodeB-p150-t6:[Topology-dist]) [LocalTopologyManagerImpl] ISPN000230: Failed to start rebalance for cache dist
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Segment 71 is in state OWNED
at org.infinispan.scattered.impl.ScatteredVersionManagerImpl.registerSegment(ScatteredVersionManagerImpl.java:248) ~[classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.scattered.impl.ScatteredStateConsumerImpl.beforeTopologyInstalled(ScatteredStateConsumerImpl.java:125) ~[classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.statetransfer.StateConsumerImpl.onTopologyUpdate(StateConsumerImpl.java:336) ~[classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.scattered.impl.ScatteredStateConsumerImpl.onTopologyUpdate(ScatteredStateConsumerImpl.java:98) ~[classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.statetransfer.StateTransferManagerImpl.doTopologyUpdate(StateTransferManagerImpl.java:215) ~[classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.statetransfer.StateTransferManagerImpl.access$000(StateTransferManagerImpl.java:53) ~[classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.statetransfer.StateTransferManagerImpl$1.rebalance(StateTransferManagerImpl.java:138) ~[classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.topology.LocalTopologyManagerImpl.doHandleRebalance(LocalTopologyManagerImpl.java:530) ~[classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.topology.LocalTopologyManagerImpl.lambda$handleRebalance$3(LocalTopologyManagerImpl.java:490) ~[classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.executors.LimitedExecutor.runTasks(LimitedExecutor.java:144) [classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.executors.LimitedExecutor.access$100(LimitedExecutor.java:33) [classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.executors.LimitedExecutor$Runner.run(LimitedExecutor.java:174) [classes/:?]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) [?:1.8.0_121]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) [?:1.8.0_121]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [?:1.8.0_121]
11:48:54,864 ERROR (testng-Test:[]) [TestSuiteProgress] Test failed: org.infinispan.distribution.rehash.RehashWithSharedStoreTest.testRehashes[SCATTERED_SYNC, tx=false, numOwners=1, l1=false]
java.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out waiting for rebalancing to complete on node Test-NodeB-32389, current topology is CacheTopology{id=8, rebalanceId=5, currentCH=PartitionerConsistentHash:ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=256, rebalanced=false, owners = (2)[Test-NodeB-32389: 85, Test-NodeC-55673: 85]}, pendingCH=null, unionCH=null, phase=NO_REBALANCE, actualMembers=[Test-NodeB-32389, Test-NodeC-55673], persistentUUIDs=[c86368c2-10f2-49a0-88e8-f975a68ba0cc, da487490-24d6-4b28-a4f8-6fb7efbe0ce0]}. rebalanceInProgress=false, currentChIsBalanced=false
at org.infinispan.test.TestingUtil.waitForNoRebalance(TestingUtil.java:383) ~[test-classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.test.TestingUtil.waitForNoRebalance(TestingUtil.java:419) ~[test-classes/:?]
at org.infinispan.distribution.rehash.RehashWithSharedStoreTest.testRehashes(RehashWithSharedStoreTest.java:82) ~[test-classes/:?]
{noformat}
> ClusterTopologyManagerTest.testAbruptLeaveAfterGetStatus2[SCATTERED_SYNC, tx=false] random failures
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-7996
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7996
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core, Test Suite - Core
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Radim Vansa
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: testsuite_stability
> Attachments: ClusterTopologyManagerTest_master_20170628.log.gz
>
>
> The test first logs a few exceptions:
> {noformat}
> 23:16:53,126 ERROR (transport-thread-Test-NodeE-p55594-t1:[Topology-___defaultcache]) [LocalTopologyManagerImpl] ISPN000230: Failed to start rebalance for cache ___defaultcache
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Segment 7 is in state OWNED
> at org.infinispan.scattered.impl.ScatteredVersionManagerImpl.registerSegment(ScatteredVersionManagerImpl.java:248) ~[classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.scattered.impl.ScatteredStateConsumerImpl.beforeTopologyInstalled(ScatteredStateConsumerImpl.java:125) ~[classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.statetransfer.StateConsumerImpl.onTopologyUpdate(StateConsumerImpl.java:336) ~[classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.scattered.impl.ScatteredStateConsumerImpl.onTopologyUpdate(ScatteredStateConsumerImpl.java:98) ~[classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.statetransfer.StateTransferManagerImpl.doTopologyUpdate(StateTransferManagerImpl.java:215) ~[classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.statetransfer.StateTransferManagerImpl.access$000(StateTransferManagerImpl.java:53) ~[classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.statetransfer.StateTransferManagerImpl$1.rebalance(StateTransferManagerImpl.java:138) ~[classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.topology.LocalTopologyManagerImpl.doHandleRebalance(LocalTopologyManagerImpl.java:526) ~[classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.topology.LocalTopologyManagerImpl.lambda$handleRebalance$3(LocalTopologyManagerImpl.java:486) ~[classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.executors.LimitedExecutor.runTasks(LimitedExecutor.java:144) [classes/:?]
> {noformat}
> And then it times out:
> {noformat}
> 23:17:52,949 ERROR (testng-Test:[]) [TestingUtil] Timed out waiting for rebalancing to complete on node Test-NodeE-8881, expected member list is [Test-NodeE-8881], current member list is [Test-NodeE-8881, Test-NodeF-9273]!
> 23:17:52,949 ERROR (testng-Test:[]) [TestSuiteProgress] Test failed: org.infinispan.statetransfer.ClusterTopologyManagerTest.testAbruptLeaveAfterGetStatus2[SCATTERED_SYNC, tx=false]
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out waiting for rebalancing to complete on node Test-NodeE-8881, expected member list is [Test-NodeE-8881], current member list is [Test-NodeE-8881, Test-NodeF-9273]!
> at org.infinispan.test.TestingUtil.waitForNoRebalance(TestingUtil.java:383) ~[test-classes/:?]
> at org.infinispan.statetransfer.ClusterTopologyManagerTest.testAbruptLeaveAfterGetStatus2(ClusterTopologyManagerTest.java:433) ~[test-classes/:?]
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
6 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8100) Measure Pod memory overhead
by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)
Sebastian Łaskawiec created ISPN-8100:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: Measure Pod memory overhead
Key: ISPN-8100
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8100
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Cloud Integrations
Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec
Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec
Currently our Pods use 70% of the container memory. We need to know how they would behave when using 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90%. We would also need to know if we should or should not use off-heap. Some testing needs to be done.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
6 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8092) Scattered cache state transfer misses segments
by Dan Berindei (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Dan Berindei reassigned ISPN-8092:
----------------------------------
Assignee: Dan Berindei (was: Radim Vansa)
> Scattered cache state transfer misses segments
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-8092
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8092
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 9.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Minor
>
> I noticed this in the pull request for [ISPN-7997|https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/5253], which uses a {{ControlledConsistentHashFactory}} to make the stream tests more predictable.
> For simplicity, I used 3 segments, and the ownership is as follows:
> * With a full cluster ABC, A owns segment 0, B owns segment 1, and C owns segment 2
> * With a smaller cluster A, AB, or AC, A owns all the segments.
> {{ScatteredStreamIteratorTest.verifyNodeLeavesAfterSendingBackSomeData[SCATTERED_SYNC, tx=false]}} kills node B, and A immediately becomes the owner of segment 1. Then the rebalance starts and A pushes segment 2 to node C, but it doesn't try to fetch any entries from segment 1 that were backed up on node C.
> {noformat}
> 17:35:09,897 DEBUG (remote-thread-test-NodeA-p2-t5:[testCache]) [ClusterTopologyManagerImpl] Updating cluster-wide current topology for cache testCache, topology = CacheTopology{id=7, rebalanceId=4, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=3, rebalanced=true, owners = (3)[test-NodeA-59810: 1, test-NodeB-37315: 1, test-NodeC-50539: 1]}, pendingCH=null, unionCH=null, phase=NO_REBALANCE, actualMembers=[test-NodeA-59810, test-NodeB-37315, test-NodeC-50539], persistentUUIDs=[6118c3ba-840e-4838-a0cf-1165d3d5ec4b, 38cc2bd9-0a21-4020-97ab-909a32506fa1, 6a4f1a13-0fbb-4f92-867e-64068d574d4d]}, availability mode = AVAILABLE
> 17:35:10,974 DEBUG (remote-thread-test-NodeA-p2-t5:[testCache]) [ClusterTopologyManagerImpl] Updating cluster-wide current topology for cache testCache, topology = CacheTopology{id=8, rebalanceId=4, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=3, rebalanced=false, owners = (2)[test-NodeA-59810: 2, test-NodeC-50539: 1]}, pendingCH=null, unionCH=null, phase=NO_REBALANCE, actualMembers=[test-NodeA-59810, test-NodeC-50539], persistentUUIDs=[6118c3ba-840e-4838-a0cf-1165d3d5ec4b, 6a4f1a13-0fbb-4f92-867e-64068d574d4d]}, availability mode = AVAILABLE
> 17:35:10,975 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t2:[Topology-testCache]) [StateConsumerImpl] On cache testCache we have: new segments: [0, 1]; old segments: [0]
> 17:35:10,975 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t2:[Topology-testCache]) [StateConsumerImpl] On cache testCache we have: added segments: {1}; removed segments: {}
> 17:35:10,975 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t2:[Topology-testCache]) [StateConsumerImpl] This is not a rebalance, not doing anything...
> 17:35:10,976 INFO (remote-thread-test-NodeA-p2-t5:[testCache]) [CLUSTER] ISPN000310: Starting cluster-wide rebalance for cache testCache, topology CacheTopology{id=9, rebalanceId=5, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=3, rebalanced=false, owners = (2)[test-NodeA-59810: 2, test-NodeC-50539: 1]}, pendingCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=3, rebalanced=true, owners = (2)[test-NodeA-59810: 3, test-NodeC-50539: 0]}, unionCH=null, phase=TRANSITORY, actualMembers=[test-NodeA-59810, test-NodeC-50539], persistentUUIDs=[6118c3ba-840e-4838-a0cf-1165d3d5ec4b, 6a4f1a13-0fbb-4f92-867e-64068d574d4d]}
> 17:35:10,977 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [CacheTopology] Current consistent hash's routing table: 0: 0, 1: 0, 2: 1
> 17:35:10,977 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [CacheTopology] Pending consistent hash's routing table: 0: 0, 1: 0, 2: 0
> 17:35:10,978 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [ScatteredVersionManager] Node will transfer value for topology 9
> 17:35:10,978 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [StateConsumerImpl] On cache testCache we have: new segments: [0, 1, 2]; old segments: [0, 1]
> 17:35:10,978 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [StateConsumerImpl] On cache testCache we have: added segments: {2}; removed segments: {}
> 17:35:10,979 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [JGroupsTransport] test-NodeA-59810 sending request 9 to all: StateRequestCommand{cache=testCache, origin=test-NodeA-59810, type=CONFIRM_REVOKED_SEGMENTS, topologyId=9, segments=null}
> 17:35:10,989 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [StateProviderImpl] Segments to replicate and invalidate: [0, 1]
> 17:35:10,989 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t1:[]) [OutboundTransferTask] Sending last chunk to node test-NodeC-50539 containing 0 cache entries from segments [0, 1]
> 17:35:10,989 TRACE (stateTransferExecutor-thread-test-NodeA-p7-t1:[StateRequest-testCache]) [RpcManagerImpl] test-NodeA-59810 invoking StateRequestCommand{cache=testCache, origin=test-NodeA-59810, type=START_KEYS_TRANSFER, topologyId=9, segments={2}} to recipient list [test-NodeC-50539] with options RpcOptions{timeout=240000, unit=MILLISECONDS, deliverOrder=NONE, responseFilter=null, responseMode=SYNCHRONOUS_IGNORE_LEAVERS}
> 17:35:11,017 INFO (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t4:[testCache]) [CLUSTER] ISPN000336: Finished cluster-wide rebalance for cache testCache, topology id = 9
> 17:35:11,017 DEBUG (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t4:[testCache]) [ClusterTopologyManagerImpl] Updating cluster-wide current topology for cache testCache, topology = CacheTopology{id=10, rebalanceId=5, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=3, rebalanced=true, owners = (2)[test-NodeA-59810: 3, test-NodeC-50539: 0]}, pendingCH=null, unionCH=null, phase=NO_REBALANCE, actualMembers=[test-NodeA-59810, test-NodeC-50539], persistentUUIDs=[6118c3ba-840e-4838-a0cf-1165d3d5ec4b, 6a4f1a13-0fbb-4f92-867e-64068d574d4d]}, availability mode = AVAILABLE
> {noformat}
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
6 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8092) Scattered cache state transfer misses segments
by Dan Berindei (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Dan Berindei updated ISPN-8092:
-------------------------------
Status: Open (was: New)
> Scattered cache state transfer misses segments
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-8092
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8092
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 9.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Minor
>
> I noticed this in the pull request for [ISPN-7997|https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/5253], which uses a {{ControlledConsistentHashFactory}} to make the stream tests more predictable.
> For simplicity, I used 3 segments, and the ownership is as follows:
> * With a full cluster ABC, A owns segment 0, B owns segment 1, and C owns segment 2
> * With a smaller cluster A, AB, or AC, A owns all the segments.
> {{ScatteredStreamIteratorTest.verifyNodeLeavesAfterSendingBackSomeData[SCATTERED_SYNC, tx=false]}} kills node B, and A immediately becomes the owner of segment 1. Then the rebalance starts and A pushes segment 2 to node C, but it doesn't try to fetch any entries from segment 1 that were backed up on node C.
> {noformat}
> 17:35:09,897 DEBUG (remote-thread-test-NodeA-p2-t5:[testCache]) [ClusterTopologyManagerImpl] Updating cluster-wide current topology for cache testCache, topology = CacheTopology{id=7, rebalanceId=4, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=3, rebalanced=true, owners = (3)[test-NodeA-59810: 1, test-NodeB-37315: 1, test-NodeC-50539: 1]}, pendingCH=null, unionCH=null, phase=NO_REBALANCE, actualMembers=[test-NodeA-59810, test-NodeB-37315, test-NodeC-50539], persistentUUIDs=[6118c3ba-840e-4838-a0cf-1165d3d5ec4b, 38cc2bd9-0a21-4020-97ab-909a32506fa1, 6a4f1a13-0fbb-4f92-867e-64068d574d4d]}, availability mode = AVAILABLE
> 17:35:10,974 DEBUG (remote-thread-test-NodeA-p2-t5:[testCache]) [ClusterTopologyManagerImpl] Updating cluster-wide current topology for cache testCache, topology = CacheTopology{id=8, rebalanceId=4, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=3, rebalanced=false, owners = (2)[test-NodeA-59810: 2, test-NodeC-50539: 1]}, pendingCH=null, unionCH=null, phase=NO_REBALANCE, actualMembers=[test-NodeA-59810, test-NodeC-50539], persistentUUIDs=[6118c3ba-840e-4838-a0cf-1165d3d5ec4b, 6a4f1a13-0fbb-4f92-867e-64068d574d4d]}, availability mode = AVAILABLE
> 17:35:10,975 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t2:[Topology-testCache]) [StateConsumerImpl] On cache testCache we have: new segments: [0, 1]; old segments: [0]
> 17:35:10,975 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t2:[Topology-testCache]) [StateConsumerImpl] On cache testCache we have: added segments: {1}; removed segments: {}
> 17:35:10,975 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t2:[Topology-testCache]) [StateConsumerImpl] This is not a rebalance, not doing anything...
> 17:35:10,976 INFO (remote-thread-test-NodeA-p2-t5:[testCache]) [CLUSTER] ISPN000310: Starting cluster-wide rebalance for cache testCache, topology CacheTopology{id=9, rebalanceId=5, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=3, rebalanced=false, owners = (2)[test-NodeA-59810: 2, test-NodeC-50539: 1]}, pendingCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=3, rebalanced=true, owners = (2)[test-NodeA-59810: 3, test-NodeC-50539: 0]}, unionCH=null, phase=TRANSITORY, actualMembers=[test-NodeA-59810, test-NodeC-50539], persistentUUIDs=[6118c3ba-840e-4838-a0cf-1165d3d5ec4b, 6a4f1a13-0fbb-4f92-867e-64068d574d4d]}
> 17:35:10,977 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [CacheTopology] Current consistent hash's routing table: 0: 0, 1: 0, 2: 1
> 17:35:10,977 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [CacheTopology] Pending consistent hash's routing table: 0: 0, 1: 0, 2: 0
> 17:35:10,978 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [ScatteredVersionManager] Node will transfer value for topology 9
> 17:35:10,978 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [StateConsumerImpl] On cache testCache we have: new segments: [0, 1, 2]; old segments: [0, 1]
> 17:35:10,978 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [StateConsumerImpl] On cache testCache we have: added segments: {2}; removed segments: {}
> 17:35:10,979 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [JGroupsTransport] test-NodeA-59810 sending request 9 to all: StateRequestCommand{cache=testCache, origin=test-NodeA-59810, type=CONFIRM_REVOKED_SEGMENTS, topologyId=9, segments=null}
> 17:35:10,989 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t3:[Topology-testCache]) [StateProviderImpl] Segments to replicate and invalidate: [0, 1]
> 17:35:10,989 TRACE (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t1:[]) [OutboundTransferTask] Sending last chunk to node test-NodeC-50539 containing 0 cache entries from segments [0, 1]
> 17:35:10,989 TRACE (stateTransferExecutor-thread-test-NodeA-p7-t1:[StateRequest-testCache]) [RpcManagerImpl] test-NodeA-59810 invoking StateRequestCommand{cache=testCache, origin=test-NodeA-59810, type=START_KEYS_TRANSFER, topologyId=9, segments={2}} to recipient list [test-NodeC-50539] with options RpcOptions{timeout=240000, unit=MILLISECONDS, deliverOrder=NONE, responseFilter=null, responseMode=SYNCHRONOUS_IGNORE_LEAVERS}
> 17:35:11,017 INFO (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t4:[testCache]) [CLUSTER] ISPN000336: Finished cluster-wide rebalance for cache testCache, topology id = 9
> 17:35:11,017 DEBUG (transport-thread-test-NodeA-p4-t4:[testCache]) [ClusterTopologyManagerImpl] Updating cluster-wide current topology for cache testCache, topology = CacheTopology{id=10, rebalanceId=5, currentCH=ScatteredConsistentHash{ns=3, rebalanced=true, owners = (2)[test-NodeA-59810: 3, test-NodeC-50539: 0]}, pendingCH=null, unionCH=null, phase=NO_REBALANCE, actualMembers=[test-NodeA-59810, test-NodeC-50539], persistentUUIDs=[6118c3ba-840e-4838-a0cf-1165d3d5ec4b, 6a4f1a13-0fbb-4f92-867e-64068d574d4d]}, availability mode = AVAILABLE
> {noformat}
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
6 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8097) ScatteredCrashInSequenceTest.testSplit failures
by Radim Vansa (JIRA)
Radim Vansa created ISPN-8097:
---------------------------------
Summary: ScatteredCrashInSequenceTest.testSplit failures
Key: ISPN-8097
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8097
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core
Affects Versions: 9.1.0.Final
Reporter: Radim Vansa
Assignee: Radim Vansa
In PrefetchInterceptor, when looking up who could be the new owner of the segment (during key/value transfer) the forked command did not have topologyId set. Therefore the cache topology (9) vs. command topology check was not executed, and the command has thrown AOLE.
STI caught this AOLE but already with the original command (topology 10), so it has decided that topology 11 is needed and waiting for this has timed out.
In the solution in PR we set the topology id which in turn results in throwing OTE with requested topology 10 directly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
6 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8097) ScatteredCrashInSequenceTest.testSplit failures
by Radim Vansa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Radim Vansa updated ISPN-8097:
------------------------------
Status: Open (was: New)
> ScatteredCrashInSequenceTest.testSplit failures
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-8097
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8097
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 9.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Radim Vansa
> Assignee: Radim Vansa
>
> In PrefetchInterceptor, when looking up who could be the new owner of the segment (during key/value transfer) the forked command did not have topologyId set. Therefore the cache topology (9) vs. command topology check was not executed, and the command has thrown AOLE.
> STI caught this AOLE but already with the original command (topology 10), so it has decided that topology 11 is needed and waiting for this has timed out.
> In the solution in PR we set the topology id which in turn results in throwing OTE with requested topology 10 directly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
6 years, 10 months