[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Magnus Magnus commented on ISPN-1141:
-------------------------------------
If think you are right the JNI based off heap container could be a better solution because
with NIO direct buffer memory free up could not handled directly.
BigMemory Direct buffer
-----------------------
Key: ISPN-1141
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1141
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Distributed Cache
Affects Versions: 5.0.0.FINAL
Reporter: Magnus Magnus
Assignee: Manik Surtani
Fix For: 5.2.0.FINAL
It should be configurable if data stored by NIO buffer or not.
It means data stored outside of java heap. Create, destroy in the external memory should
be managed by infinispan.
With this solution gc can run fast however infinispan node can handle huge amount of
memory.
In the current case the optional size of the java memory of a node is smaller or equals
than 4GB because of garbage collection issues above 4GB.
See a similar thing in EHCache BigMemory.
http://www.snoopal.com/documents/GaSovOTchHCsOF5X7bG691/-Scale-over-the-l...
12nd page
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira