Hi Rafael and everyone,
Do I need to change the 6.4.x-develop branch of the quickstarts at this
point? And if so, what do I need to do?
* Do I need to add the repository to all the POM files?
* Should I update all the README files to mention that it is not a
good practice to add the repository to the POM files?
* Should I remove the settings.xml file?
Thanks,
Sande
On 09/05/2014 07:58 AM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
Em 9/5/14, 8:47, Max Rydahl Andersen escreveu:
> so a few things:
>
> in stacks.yml the id is 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' and in
> this patch it is 'jboss-products-ga-repo' but it is still using the
> techpreview url (/techpreview/all).
>
Since the Archtypes were released, should I update the Stacks to `
jboss-product-repository` for those archtypes only ? Then I update
the patch for 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' for the next EAP 6.4
release ?
> I can also see that earlyaccess is now enabled by default on
>
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts/commit/358479339...
> is that expected ?
I don't know.
>
> Anyways:
>
> 1) can we agree on aligning the id's ? (just so we are in sync)
Yeap. For sure! I'll update the patch file now for to
'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' as I just said..
>
> 2) is it expected the id says 'ga' but the url is not that ?
Once that we change to ' redhat-techpreview-all-repository' it won't
matter anymore.
>
> For #1 we should look at updating that in stacks.yml so we add it
> with the same id.
>
> Before changing stacks.yml I want to be sure #2 was consistent choice
> we wanted to make for that?
>
> ps. we actually also add this repo as a plugin repository - not sure
> if that matters for you?
I don't think it matters since the tests worked fine.
So that's my plan:
1 - Update the patch file to use 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository'
as repo id instead of 'jboss-products-ga-repo'. It will be available
for next EAP 6.4 Archtype release.
2 - Wait for your answer if we should update stacks.yaml repo to '
jboss-products-ga-repo' for EAP 6.3 Archetypes only
Is that right ?
>
> /max
_______________________________________________
jbossdeveloper mailing list
jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper