3:01 p.m.
Ref to the branches, I also think that we should do a cleanup removing
- 6.2.x-develop
- 6.3.x-develop
- jdf-2.1.9.Final
branches (keeping the tags)
Btw,
There's also a kitchensink-angularjs and wildfly branches that were not
updated since last year.
Anyone has any objections on removing theses branches ?
Em 8/14/14, 16:04, Sande Gilda escreveu:
Rafael, that sounds great to me.
Paul, does this work for you?
On 08/14/2014 02:26 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
> I think we should tag the 6.3 quickstarts, then keep the same 6.3.x
> for EAP 6.3.1 and rename the 6.3.x-develop to 6.4.x-develop
>
> 6.3.x-develop -> rename to 6.4.x-develop
> 6.3.x -> keep it to EAP 6.3.1
>
> That's what I think about it.
>
>
> Em 8/14/14, 14:33, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>> Now that JBoss EAP 6.3 is GA, do we need to tag the quickstarts and
>> create new branches for EAP 6.3.1 and EAP 6.4? It's so seldom we do
>> this that I forget!
>>
>
3:26 p.m.
New subject: Do we need to tag the quickstarts?
Comments in line for this email and your first one.
On 15 Aug 2014, at 14:01, Rafael Benevides <benevides(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Ref to the branches, I also think that we should do a cleanup
removing
- 6.2.x-develop
- 6.3.x-develop
IMO: Correct, providing there are no micro releases of EAP 6.2 and EAP 6.3 planned.
- jdf-2.1.9.Final
branches (keeping the tags)
Btw,
There's also a kitchensink-angularjs and wildfly branches that were not
updated since last year.
Anyone has any objections on removing theses branches ?
Em 8/14/14, 16:04, Sande Gilda escreveu:
> Rafael, that sounds great to me.
>
> Paul, does this work for you?
>
> On 08/14/2014 02:26 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>> I think we should tag the 6.3 quickstarts, then keep the same 6.3.x
>> for EAP 6.3.1 and rename the 6.3.x-develop to 6.4.x-develop
>>
>> 6.3.x-develop -> rename to 6.4.x-develop
>> 6.3.x -> keep it to EAP 6.3.1
This looks right to me too. See: https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-928619
>>
>> That's what I think about it.
>>
>>
>> Em 8/14/14, 14:33, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>> Now that JBoss EAP 6.3 is GA, do we need to tag the quickstarts and
>>> create new branches for EAP 6.3.1 and EAP 6.4? It's so seldom we do
>>> this that I forget!
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
jbossdeveloper mailing list
jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper
Paul.
--
Paul Robinson
JBoss Developer Team Lead (www.jboss.org)
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors:Michael Cunningham (US), Charles Peters (US), Matt Parson (US), Paul Hickey
(Ireland)
4:11 p.m.
New subject: Do we need to tag the quickstarts?
On 08/15/2014 09:26 AM, Paul Robinson wrote:
Comments in line for this email and your first one.
On 15 Aug 2014, at 14:01, Rafael Benevides <benevides(a)redhat.com
<mailto:benevides@redhat.com>> wrote:
> Ref to the branches, I also think that we should do a cleanup removing
>
> - 6.2.x-develop
> - 6.3.x-develop
IMO: Correct, providing there are no micro releases of EAP 6.2 and EAP
6.3 planned.
If there is a 6.3.1 product release, the quickstarts will be based on
6he 6.3.x product branch, which we are keeping.
> - jdf-2.1.9.Final
>
> branches (keeping the tags)
>
> Btw,
>
> There's also a kitchensink-angularjs and wildfly branches that were not
> updated since last year.
>
>
> Anyone has any objections on removing theses branches ?
>
> Em 8/14/14, 16:04, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>> Rafael, that sounds great to me.
>>
>> Paul, does this work for you?
>>
>> On 08/14/2014 02:26 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>> I think we should tag the 6.3 quickstarts, then keep the same 6.3.x
>>> for EAP 6.3.1 and rename the 6.3.x-develop to 6.4.x-develop
>>>
>>> 6.3.x-develop -> rename to 6.4.x-develop
>>> 6.3.x -> keep it to EAP 6.3.1
This looks right to me too. See: https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-928619
Paul, I totally forgot about the JBoss Developer Materials Repository
Management and Releases document. Thanks for the reminder and URL!
>>>
>>> That's what I think about it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Em 8/14/14, 14:33, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>>> Now that JBoss EAP 6.3 is GA, do we need to tag the quickstarts and
>>>> create new branches for EAP 6.3.1 and EAP 6.4? It's so seldom we do
>>>> this that I forget!
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbossdeveloper mailing list
> jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:jbossdeveloper@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper
Paul.
--
Paul Robinson
JBoss Developer Team Lead (www.jboss.org <http://www.jboss.org>)
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors:Michael Cunningham (US), Charles Peters (US), Matt Parson
(US), Paul Hickey (Ireland)
3:32 p.m.
New subject: Do we need to tag the quickstarts?
I made the following updates to
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts:
* Created the 6.4.x-develop branch based on the current 6.3.x-develop
branch and made it the default branch.
* Removed the following branches:
o 6.2.x-develop
o 6.3.x-develop
o jdf-2.1.9.Final
* Tagged the 6.3.x branch with the 6.3.0.GA tag. Rafael suggested this
should be done using dist/release.sh to update the versions, create
the tag and remove template folder. We will check with Paul Gier
when he gets back to do this property.
On 08/15/2014 09:01 AM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
Ref to the branches, I also think that we should do a cleanup
removing
- 6.2.x-develop
- 6.3.x-develop
- jdf-2.1.9.Final
branches (keeping the tags)
Btw,
There's also a kitchensink-angularjs and wildfly branches that were
not updated since last year.
Anyone has any objections on removing theses branches ?
Em 8/14/14, 16:04, Sande Gilda escreveu:
> Rafael, that sounds great to me.
>
> Paul, does this work for you?
>
> On 08/14/2014 02:26 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>> I think we should tag the 6.3 quickstarts, then keep the same 6.3.x
>> for EAP 6.3.1 and rename the 6.3.x-develop to 6.4.x-develop
>>
>> 6.3.x-develop -> rename to 6.4.x-develop
>> 6.3.x -> keep it to EAP 6.3.1
>>
>> That's what I think about it.
>>
>>
>> Em 8/14/14, 14:33, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>> Now that JBoss EAP 6.3 is GA, do we need to tag the quickstarts and
>>> create new branches for EAP 6.3.1 and EAP 6.4? It's so seldom we do
>>> this that I forget!
>>>
>>
>
3548
days inactive
3548
days old
jbossdeveloper@lists.jboss.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Paul Robinson -
Rafael Benevides -
Sande Gilda