Re: [jdf-dev] BOM to JBDS

> Here are the issues I could dig out related to this: > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-1701 - hardcoding of > jboss.org repo in generated pom.xml (fixed) > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-1824 - integrate with JBoss > Integration BOM (fixed - in November) > > Those two I thought was done and thus should be working - but maybe the > BOM's changed or the plugin has not been updated or something ? My understanding is that there is no BOM for FSW/SwitchYard. > > Rob - do you know what the status is for SY project wizard to be BOM and > maven.enterprise.redhat.com friendly ? > My understanding from previous questions on this was that it already was > in place or being worked on. I don't think it's unfriendly. It simply adds SwitchYard dependencies to the user's pom. It's up to the user to have their repositories configured correctly so the dependencies can be resolved. In this case, it looks like a transitive dependency is missing from the configured repositories. > > I can see you already responded on > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079463 but seems like it > boils down to borked > maven dependencies ? (i.e. the wizard actually targets a BOM but the > repo does not work with it) That was how it looked to me. Something in the dependency chain requires that GAV, but it isn't available from any of the repositories, which is why I redirected the issue to the build guys. > > /max > >> Agreed. As a separate topic, we do need to sort out BOMs for FSW, but >> that won’t make them get magically used :-D >> >> On 22 Mar 2014, at 04:32, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Maybe I'm missing something but this issue is not about missing a >>> place to host boms is it ? but hat the switchyard project wizard is >>> not creating the projects with a proper Pom.xml. >>> >>> I thought this was done a while ago since I reported similar issue >>> before the New Years. I'll need to dig that one out when I get back >>> to laptop. >>> >>> Lete know if I'm missing something. >>> >>> Julian have you talked with rob Cernich about it yet ? >>> >>> /max (sent from my phone) >>> >>> >>>> On 21/03/2014, at 22.05, Rafael Benevides <benevides(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> We can build it together. >>>> >>>> As long as Pete Muir approves it, I can create a new repo on github >>>> https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-fsw-boms to host >>>> >>>> org.jboss.bom.fsw:jboss-javaee-6.0-with-switchyard:switchyard-version>. >>>> >>>> I can put a skeleton there, so you can adjust swithchyward BOMs as >>>> needed (managed dependencies GAVs). >>>> >>>> Please, let me know if this works for you. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Em 21/03/14 13:05, Julian Coleman escreveu: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> What's the process for adding the developer BOM's to JBDS? Looking >>>>> at: >>>>> >>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079463 >>>>> >>>>> the reason that it happens is that the project is created without >>>>> the BOM >>>>> to version manage the transitive dependencies. This will be a >>>>> requirement >>>>> for future platform builds because the POM transitive list might >>>>> not be >>>>> shipped in the maven repository - only the BOM's will have the >>>>> correct list. >>>>> >>>>> So, we need to make sure that a (e.g.) SwitchYard project starts >>>>> with the >>>>> (e.g.) jboss-javaee-6.0-with-switchyard BOM, otherwise it's not >>>>> going to >>>>> build. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> J >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jdf-dev mailing list >>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jdf-dev mailing list >>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen >