Re: [jdf-dev] What to do about the unsupported jdf quickstarts

Hi, 1) regarding me, as an author, I am okay with marking it as Sandbox. But that will make QA skip it in tests and I am afraid the quickstart will stop working after some time :/ Can we keep this new info secret? ;-)

2) I would rather create a new tag, Status, than use Target Product: None. Feels better.

Ondra On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 10:12 -0400, Sande Gilda wrote: > I think something like that qualifies for a new "Status:" or "Note:" > metadata tag. > > On 09/18/2012 10:07 AM, Pete Muir wrote: > > On 18 Sep 2012, at 14:58, Sande Gilda wrote: > > > >> Good. I didn't want to lose them from the community quickstarts. :-) > >> > >> Then you're proposing a new metadata tag? Could we just use the tag "Target Product: None" > > That would work/ > > > >> or "Target Product: Sandbox"? > >> > >> What do you envision when you say "We could then use this display a notice or something on the site."? > > Like we have the Endorsed badge for JDF, maybe we can do a "Warning: Not supported by Red Hat" banner or similar. > > > >> > >> On 09/18/2012 09:52 AM, Pete Muir wrote: > >>> On 18 Sep 2012, at 14:48, Sande Gilda wrote: > >>> > >>>> Not sure what you mean by a "sandbox". Would they be totally pulled from the community version? > >>> No, probably just identified in their readme: > >>> > >>> Status: Sandbox > >>> > >>> Status: Recommended > >>> > >>> We could then use this display a notice or something on the site. > >>> > >>>> On 09/18/2012 09:45 AM, Pete Muir wrote: > >>>>> All > >>>>> > >>>>> We have three quickstarts that aren't supported under a JBoss product - Hibernate 3, and Wicket EAR/WAR. I would like to propose that we move these to a sandbox. > >>>>> > >>>>> WDYT? > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> jdf-dev mailing list > >>>>> > jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > >>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev > > >