Re: [jdf-dev] Picketlink version on EAP BOMs

IMO let's add the -with-security BOM only for EAP 6.2 On 9 Sep 2013, at 22:33, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > As we discussed, 6.1 is shipped with PicketLink 2.1. > > The artifacts available with the Security BOM are for 2.5 (eg.: picketlink-api, picketlink-impl). So I'm not sure if makes sense to have those artifacts as they don't exist with 2.1. > > Users using 6.1 are PicketLink Federation users, which in most cases is just a matter of the PicketLink modules usage. But some times, users want to extend PicketLink Federation features and for that they need the 2.1 libraries on the classpath of their applications. > > Wondering if is better to change EAP 6.1 BOMs to match 2.1 artifacts. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rafael Benevides" <benevides(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Pedro Igor" <psilva(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Anil Saldhana" <asaldhan(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Peter Skopek" <pskopek(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Marek Novotný" <mnovotny(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Peter Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt;, "jdf-dev" <jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 6:12:54 PM > Subject: Re: Picketlink version on EAP BOMs > > Adding Pedro Igor... > > Em 09/09/13 17:36, Rafael Benevides escreveu: >> Hi all, >> >> We released today the EAP BOMs version 6.2.0-redhat-1 with Picketlink >> 2.5.1. >> >> Under EAP BOMs we will maintain for now two branches: 6.2.x and 6.1.x >> >> I was wondering that our branch 6.1.x should be fixed with the right >> EAP 6.1.x version: Picketlink 2.1.6. >> >> Today I talked to Pedro Igor who told me that it seems a not easy job >> to have the -with-security BOM for EAP 6.1.x/PL 2.16 for many reason >> that he can explain better than me. >> >> Another approach that I'd like to query everyone is the possibility to >> remove -with-security BOM from EAP 6.1.x if it is not possible to have >> this BOM working fine for EAP 6.1.x >> >> I expected to hear your comments about the desired/right way to have >> EAP 6.1.x BOM with -with-security/Picketlink BOM. >> >> Thanks >>