-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 06/12/2014 03:12 PM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
Ok, so, what about this then:
- keycloak (wildfly + auth server war + KC subsystem) -
keycloak-wildfly (wildfly + KC subsystem, no auth-server) -
keycloak-examples ("keycloak-full" image + examples)
s/keycloak-full/keycloak/
What about the names? Do they match the expectation?
- Juca.
On 06/12/2014 02:52 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
> On 6/12/2014 8:49 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>> On 6/12/2014 2:16 AM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
>>> - - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war, no KC subsystem)
>> I would say no to this one. Eventually, the whole wildfly
>> instance will be secured by KC and we will need the subsystem.
>>
>>
> I'll add my -1 as well.
_______________________________________________ keycloak-user
mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTmagdAAoJEDnJtskdmzLMuiUH/0lSyb/DArDsn5oLeeGDaLEF
qqcaoW0jpW547LopYr8ksNgaaz2u0jWQyEED4bdeiUItRNBZ9WBX6w7T6P6fewZZ
V+pgvyoYjWM18e+oXWJqHxB4DpNo861OL590oa4stS285oKcFRZSSJWXH3zPnnZT
fRPXSoIpnmmpc5Agj9IB5T0sKMoh7cTkgdVh6KkZMcf8HFiz2GTqw4BTKtxZ+Mrb
uvJ1C8LH0ok4Xdbxlaj2PxX5dSwjZX7yibX9Rco2fLC2Z7NrizU+bvsr5CaWoBH5
ts/ikivCq5MhasBFwbUf925GlO3fo5JRyM6pXXklfPudPLOk9Uahk2d6owOam/s=
=yw7i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----