You are right. We are not considering roles associated with groups. We also
lack a group based policy ....
For the former, I've created
.
Will start working on those two issues before next release.
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Hübner, Bettina <Bettina.Huebner(a)kvbawue.de>
wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I noticed the same behaviour and it still happens in version 3.1.0.CR1.
Effective Roles are not taken into account by the Policy Evaluation Tool,
only roles assigned directly to a user.
Best regards
Bettina
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: keycloak-user-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:keycloak-user-bounces@
lists.jboss.org] Im Auftrag von Jeremy Majors
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Februar 2017 22:57
An: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Betreff: [keycloak-user] Group Level Roles Not Honored by Policy
Evaluation Tool
I have setup my users to have the 'read' role by associating that role to
a group which my users have been associated with. While testing the
policies for a resource using the Policy Evaluation tool I determined that
the roles associated with the groups weren't being picked up and the user
was being denied access to the resource (please note that when I looked at
the user's roles I did notice that 'read' was listed as an effective
role). When I removed one of the users from the group and directly
assigned the 'role' to the user then I was able to successfully access the
resource using the Policy Evaluation tool.
Can anyone else reproduce this issue? It's unclear whether it could be
related to KEYCLOAK-2964, which has been closed.
Thanks in advance,
Jeremy
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user