Re: [keycloak-user] Accessing JGroups ports in Docker keycloak-ha-postgres

Hi, I've tried in different docker environments (compose, kubernetes, standalone) to get a HA setup running using https://hub.docker.com/r/ jboss/keycloak-ha-postgres/. Keycloak nodes start all right, but are unaware of each other. Curiously I fail to reach the JGroups ports from any other container or host system. When I try -Djboss.bind.address.private=0.0.0.0 there's an error during startup: MSC000001: Failed to start service jboss.jgroups.channel.ee: org.jboss.msc.service.StartException in service jboss.jgroups.channel.ee: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: java.net.BindException: [UDP] / 0.0.0.0 is not a valid address on any local network interface at org.wildfly.clustering.jgroups.spi.service.ChannelBuilder.start( ChannelBuilder.java:80) Caused by: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: java.net.BindException: [UDP] /0.0.0.0 is not a valid address on any local network interface at org.wildfly.security.manager.WildFlySecurityManager.doChecked( WildFlySecurityManager.java:640) Caused by: java.net.BindException: [UDP] /0.0.0.0 is not a valid address on any local network interface at org.jgroups.util.Util.checkIfValidAddress(Util.java:3522) ... or if I switch to stack="tcp" in the jgroups subsystem: MSC000001: Failed to start service jboss.jgroups.channel.ee: org.jboss.msc.service.StartException in service jboss.jgroups.channel.ee: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: java.net.BindException: [TCP] / 0.0.0.0 is not a valid address on any local network interface I guess this is a generic Wildfly topic, but I'm curious how the official Keycloak docker containers are tested. In a docker context, the only two interfaces I can bind to are 0.0.0.0 and 127.0.0.1. regards Staffan Olsson