Re: [keycloak-user] Relative host possible in redirect URI when using Keycloak appliance?

From: "Guy Davis" <guydavis.ca(a)gmail.com&gt; To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Monday, 23 March, 2015 3:44:56 PM Subject: [keycloak-user] Relative host possible in redirect URI when using Keycloak appliance? Good day, A few weeks ago, I was deploying auth-server.war inside a JBoss 6.1.0alpha instance and using relative URIs for redirects on my registered applications. For example, a single redirect uri of '/hello-world/*' meant that I could access our app from: * http://localhost:8080/hello-world/ * https://localhost:8443/hello-world/ * http://[workstation]:8080/hello-world/ * https://[workstation]:8443/hello-world/ This was very convenient as we deploy the JBoss container on site for customer use via automated installer, so trying to minimize the local configurations required is important. However, as per recent exchanges with Stian, I am now running a separate Keycloak appliance instance (Wildfly 8.2), port-shifted by 100, along-side our old JBoss instance. This seems to require that I add 4 separate redirect_uris (above) in order for things to work. As well, the latter two require knowledge of the target machine's hostname. I'm wondering if there is a way to use relative host URI, but keep the port for application redirect_uri. Or perhaps a hostname placeholder? Possible example: * http://${ jboss.host.name }:8080/hello-world/ Any sort of placeholder for the current host-name would simplify the current post-install configuration required.

Thanks, Guy _______________________________________________ keycloak-user mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user