Hi Rong,
Can you provide more details about your use case ? For instance:
* Are you the service owner ?
* Is your service using a REST-style ? How the API looks like ?
* Is your service already protected using a bearer token ?
* How are you representing the user's unit ? Realm, Group, role or just a
user claim/attribute ?
* What is behind: "Users should not have the access to patients in a unit
that they are not authorized". What "not authorized" really means ? What
kinds of policies you want to apply ?
From what you described, it seems that you can achieve what you want with different
approaches. It all depends on what you really need and how fine-grained you want to be.
For instance, units can be represented as groups in Keycloak. You can enforce group
membership in your application by introspecting the bearer token (issued by a Keycloak
server to some client). The same logic applies if you are using roles or attributes to
represent units.
In 2.0.0.Final, we have introduced Keycloak Authorization Services. This one is
related with externalized and fine-grained authorization, which gives you great
flexibility to define, manage, deploy and enforce authorization polices to your
application and organization. Indeed, one of the protocols we are supporting (not fully,
yet), UMA, is pretty much based on several healthcare use cases. For instance, you can
manage the policies that apply to patient records in Keycloak and also let Keycloak
enforce these policies to requests sent to your application. In this case, you can define
not only a "from unit have access" policy, but also apply even more fine-grained
policies to your service using the different policy providers (ABAC and Context-based,
RBAC, Time-based, Rules-based, User-based, more to come...) we provide. We are still
missing some very nice parts of UMA though, as currently we are focusing on API security
use cases. But I hope to get those missing parts implemented soon.
Regards.
Pedro Igor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rong Sang (CL-ATL)" <rsang(a)carelogistics.com>
To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 5:23:20 PM
Subject: [keycloak-user] How to implement this using Keycloak
Hi all,
I’m doing a POC using Keycloak. The normal authentication/authorization features work
well, but I have the following requirement that cannot find a straightforward solution
for. I hope some security experts in the mailing list can point me to the right direction.
Here is the requirement. A hospital has multiple units. Users should not have the access
to patients in a unit that they are not authorized. I have one service that returns a list
of patients across units. What’s the best way to set up authorization for this service?
As I said earlier, I cannot find a feature for me to implement this. Any idea is greatly
appreciated.
Thanks,
Rong
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user