2:02 a.m.
I'd like to rewrite it to be all REST to be nice and modern and cool :)
On 4 May 2016 at 17:15, Marek Posolda <mposolda(a)redhat.com> wrote:
+1 to use the token. If relying on token is bad for security, then
"external" application would be broken too, isn't it?
But another issue is, that account management doesn't have token as there
is not full OIDC here. It relies just on the cookie authentication. We can
sort it easily by having helper methods "isMemberOf", which will take all
direct and indirect roles memberhips though.
Or are we going to rewrite account management to be angular+REST ? It
seems it will help with much more things (REST endpoints for users, no CSRF
issues, possibly better UI).
Marek
On 04/05/16 17:09, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
We really need to remove this stuff and just rely on the token.
On 4 May 2016 17:06, "Marek Posolda" < <mposolda(a)redhat.com>
mposolda(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Yeah, information is available. Problem is that it's ignored :-)
>
> Both admin console and account management are just using "user.hasRole"
> when asking if user is member of particular role. This returns false for
> the role mappings, which are available indirectly through groups.
>
> Marek
>
> On 04/05/16 16:50, Bill Burke wrote:
>
> This was by design. Since the information is available to these built-in
> applications, it seemed that much safer to ignore the token permissions.
>
> On 5/4/2016 10:43 AM, Marek Posolda wrote:
>
> Just tested the scenario and I confirm there is an issue. It would work
> for all your external applications, as roles, which are indirectly assigned
> to user through group mappings, are correctly available inside accessToken.
> However Keycloak builtin applications (admin console and account
> management) doesn't read roles from the token, hence it doesn't work there.
> I've created JIRA for:
> admin console: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2969
> account management: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2970
>
> Marek
>
> On 02/05/16 22:33, Jason Axley wrote:
>
> I have an LDAP user who is definitely listed as being in a given LDAP
> group in Keycloak admin console.
>
> If I grant the User the admin Realm Role in the master realm, they can
> login and access the admin console for the master realm.
>
> However, if I remove the direct role grant from the user and add it to
> the LDAP group, keycloak doesn’t think the user has the role and gives an
> error that the user “You don't have access to the requested resource.”
> with the below exception:
>
> 2016-05-02 20:25:37,677 ERROR [org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy_jaxrs.i18n]
> (default task-2) RESTEASY002005: Failed executing GET /admin/serverinfo:
> org.keycloak.services.ForbiddenException
>
> at
> org.keycloak.services.resources.admin.AdminRoot.getServerInfo(AdminRoot.java:231)
>
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>
> at
>
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
>
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.core.ResourceLocatorInvoker.createResource(ResourceLocatorInvoker.java:79)
>
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.core.ResourceLocatorInvoker.createResource(ResourceLocatorInvoker.java:58)
>
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.core.ResourceLocatorInvoker.invoke(ResourceLocatorInvoker.java:100)
>
> at
> org.jboss.resteasy.core.SynchronousDispatcher.invoke(SynchronousDispatcher.java:395)
>
> at
> org.jboss.resteasy.core.SynchronousDispatcher.invoke(SynchronousDispatcher.java:202)
>
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.ServletContainerDispatcher.service(ServletContainerDispatcher.java:221)
>
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.HttpServletDispatcher.service(HttpServletDispatcher.java:56)
>
> at
>
org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.HttpServletDispatcher.service(HttpServletDispatcher.java:51)
>
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790)
>
> at
> io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletHandler.handleRequest(ServletHandler.java:85)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.FilterHandler$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterHandler.java:129)
>
> at
>
org.keycloak.services.filters.KeycloakSessionServletFilter.doFilter(KeycloakSessionServletFilter.java:78)
>
> at io.undertow.servlet.core.ManagedFilter.doFilter(ManagedFilter.java:60)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.FilterHandler$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterHandler.java:131)
>
> at
> io.undertow.servlet.handlers.FilterHandler.handleRequest(FilterHandler.java:84)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletSecurityRoleHandler.handleRequest(ServletSecurityRoleHandler.java:62)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletDispatchingHandler.handleRequest(ServletDispatchingHandler.java:36)
>
> at
>
org.wildfly.extension.undertow.security.SecurityContextAssociationHandler.handleRequest(SecurityContextAssociationHandler.java:78)
>
> at
> io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.SSLInformationAssociationHandler.handleRequest(SSLInformationAssociationHandler.java:131)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletAuthenticationCallHandler.handleRequest(ServletAuthenticationCallHandler.java:57)
>
> at
> io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.security.handlers.AbstractConfidentialityHandler.handleRequest(AbstractConfidentialityHandler.java:46)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletConfidentialityConstraintHandler.handleRequest(ServletConfidentialityConstraintHandler.java:64)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.security.handlers.AuthenticationMechanismsHandler.handleRequest(AuthenticationMechanismsHandler.java:60)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.CachedAuthenticatedSessionHandler.handleRequest(CachedAuthenticatedSessionHandler.java:77)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.security.handlers.NotificationReceiverHandler.handleRequest(NotificationReceiverHandler.java:50)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.security.handlers.AbstractSecurityContextAssociationHandler.handleRequest(AbstractSecurityContextAssociationHandler.java:43)
>
> at
> io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
>
> at
>
org.wildfly.extension.undertow.security.jacc.JACCContextIdHandler.handleRequest(JACCContextIdHandler.java:61)
>
> at
> io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
>
> at
> io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.handleFirstRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:284)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.dispatchRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:263)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.access$000(ServletInitialHandler.java:81)
>
> at
>
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$1.handleRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:174)
>
> at io.undertow.server.Connectors.executeRootHandler(Connectors.java:202)
>
> at
> io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange$1.run(HttpServerExchange.java:793)
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>
>
>
> Is there something magical that needs to be configured for this to work?
> Or does this look like a bug?
>
> I also did a quick test where I created a new local group and did the
> same role assignment to the group, and assigned the group to the same LDAP
> user and it did not grant access.
>
> -Jason
>
> *Jason Axley*
>
> Sr. Security Engineer, Expedia Worldwide Engineering Team
>
> 425-679-4157 (o) | 206-484-2778 (m) | 206-55-AXLEY (gv)
>
> 333 108th Ave NE, 9S-282, Bellevue, WA 98004
>
> EWE Security Wiki <https://confluence/display/POS/EWE+Security>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing
listkeycloak-user@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing
listkeycloak-user@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hathttp://bill.burkecentral.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing
listkeycloak-user@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>