1:16 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
All,
Very soon, the official Docker images will be hosted on the Docker's
indexer, under the JBoss' namespace. As such, it's a good idea to
spend some minutes thinking about the image names (as the URL is
dependent on it).
My proposal would be:
- - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war, no KC subsystem)
- - keycloak-full ("keycloak" image + KC subsystem)
- - keycloak-wildfly (wildfly + KC subsystem, no auth-server)
- - keycloak-examples ("keycloak-full" image + examples)
If you have comments about the naming and/or contents, let me know.
- - Juca.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTmUXAAAoJEDnJtskdmzLMB5EH/0r1Pb/sZBtf0qm7yQ8pPvbn
RDNbo6JYtQWcK04Etg3sPbKA1JOE/BkSbn3WXZuDffq74E8XsafCtOXkEppbok7a
o/RgFnadRJMfqutRU/TzFpNVofaeJjwYQIUfOATT2GO/PKwk57DXJ9fFndWQzhn/
hoKgDq8jL0TK2a9zzGPEeeFdFLGMiwgHK5ps7wfUm70OQ99FjO3QWFagaPZvRHI8
yaKiGfjDlLWT2EBU2pY9BsgryS+23g6069jfEcTSB8XR+kYcuPMstedGwYOq7aDb
40ziOQP8x+RMyGV+tVEy+8PkvAHEkRjNUxC13T981fpS5xLjCxRFRSnu8VHoeY8=
=G+M+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7:49 a.m.
On 6/12/2014 2:16 AM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
- - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war, no KC subsystem)
I would say no to this one. Eventually, the whole wildfly instance will
be secured by KC and we will need the subsystem.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
7:52 a.m.
On 6/12/2014 8:49 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
On 6/12/2014 2:16 AM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
> - - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war, no KC subsystem)
I would say no to this one. Eventually, the whole wildfly instance will
be secured by KC and we will need the subsystem.
I'll add my -1 as well.
8:12 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Ok, so, what about this then:
- - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war + KC subsystem)
- - keycloak-wildfly (wildfly + KC subsystem, no auth-server)
- - keycloak-examples ("keycloak-full" image + examples)
What about the names? Do they match the expectation?
- - Juca.
On 06/12/2014 02:52 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
On 6/12/2014 8:49 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>
> On 6/12/2014 2:16 AM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
>> - - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war, no KC subsystem)
> I would say no to this one. Eventually, the whole wildfly
> instance will be secured by KC and we will need the subsystem.
>
>
I'll add my -1 as well.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTmadJAAoJEDnJtskdmzLMT80H/0951MgR5r18RWnzCLsN2nfn
ZTZcgPrz/OKiaYvqINYPXza0kskhexW7bxV+AeJigIpTdlliuFz6d9cchTyxyDT9
1KyVCeQyFPBgr3n1JyK6k0Z3Oud/8W2MvRjkW+rDoB2H9O/Y/aow6d4ADkVuDp27
0bG0WIrIWnFD8Agv+CcrY9+kbkXGXXyJRBQqv6qLJL/+7OU3MLy7evhgb2nbtJrY
MiynWxcwVc8GWaaB+h8chwE/ZAtvjfvF/5X4MwBcR1bqzW/hF20bUdLgCSDG3QId
zzaUCI/pcpfbMGvwPN9Yyd6KYUic8tfpWSqEx+jluVd7uRI0RVg4ew93srLE0dI=
=In75
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8:16 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 06/12/2014 03:12 PM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
Ok, so, what about this then:
- keycloak (wildfly + auth server war + KC subsystem) -
keycloak-wildfly (wildfly + KC subsystem, no auth-server) -
keycloak-examples ("keycloak-full" image + examples)
s/keycloak-full/keycloak/
What about the names? Do they match the expectation?
- Juca.
On 06/12/2014 02:52 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
> On 6/12/2014 8:49 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>> On 6/12/2014 2:16 AM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
>>> - - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war, no KC subsystem)
>> I would say no to this one. Eventually, the whole wildfly
>> instance will be secured by KC and we will need the subsystem.
>>
>>
> I'll add my -1 as well.
_______________________________________________ keycloak-user
mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTmagdAAoJEDnJtskdmzLMuiUH/0lSyb/DArDsn5oLeeGDaLEF
qqcaoW0jpW547LopYr8ksNgaaz2u0jWQyEED4bdeiUItRNBZ9WBX6w7T6P6fewZZ
V+pgvyoYjWM18e+oXWJqHxB4DpNo861OL590oa4stS285oKcFRZSSJWXH3zPnnZT
fRPXSoIpnmmpc5Agj9IB5T0sKMoh7cTkgdVh6KkZMcf8HFiz2GTqw4BTKtxZ+Mrb
uvJ1C8LH0ok4Xdbxlaj2PxX5dSwjZX7yibX9Rco2fLC2Z7NrizU+bvsr5CaWoBH5
ts/ikivCq5MhasBFwbUf925GlO3fo5JRyM6pXXklfPudPLOk9Uahk2d6owOam/s=
=yw7i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
9:44 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
So, I've uploaded the following images to my namespace on Docker. If
those look good, I'll get them available on jboss' namespace
(jboss/keycloak, for instance).
https://hub.docker.com/u/jpkroehling/
keycloak-wildfly
- - Wildfly 8.1.0.Final + KC subsystem
keycloak (this should be the default one, hence the shorter name)
- - "keycloak-wildfly" + Auth-server
keycloak-examples
- - "keycloak" + examples
Those can be tested with these commands:
$ docker run -it -p 8080:8080 jpkroehling/keycloak
$ docker run -it -p 8080:8080 jpkroehling/keycloak-wildfly
$ docker run -it -p 8080:8080 jpkroehling/keycloak-examples
- - Juca.
On 06/12/2014 03:16 PM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
> keycloak (wildfly + auth server war + KC subsystem) -
> keycloak-wildfly (wildfly + KC subsystem, no auth-server) -
> keycloak-examples ("keycloak-full" image + examples)
s/keycloak-full/keycloak/
> What about the names? Do they match the expectation?
> - Juca.
> On 06/12/2014 02:52 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>> On 6/12/2014 8:49 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/12/2014 2:16 AM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
>>>> - - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war, no KC subsystem)
>>> I would say no to this one. Eventually, the whole wildfly
>>> instance will be secured by KC and we will need the
>>> subsystem.
>>>
>>>
>> I'll add my -1 as well.
> _______________________________________________ keycloak-user
> mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
_______________________________________________ keycloak-user
mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTmbzCAAoJEDnJtskdmzLMPc0H/3MIg4gJeJa1hUqtJtkWvIF3
MlJG+OeaJRgw/ueZ7RxBRtCFbwK0y0z6J5vThG9ihHswbGzpWTh5eOBEvoT9mr71
VnizO4fFeY3TBe+237ONtGx5ZLxMQUIjh+zo+DiWs66QHdo46gi5XIDTRJV8j75B
VhOg7sFN0Ndo2A74/rAsHyH89sOkDCyYlNDWFN03Jw1WY2dwaOhz6D0SBOfGUDit
Vlia+W5t9ubg1+aDxByjFG2TQoNVJX8tuwqChcDjE81v8QahJAu9I79ayREfO4gv
EUZ9/4wkQcmKWYNIVN0QRDiA6ne5HZ7uekSv1KBzymi0/GBokC7nfsuWn6uwb5E=
=aSEH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
4:44 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
All,
The images have been integrated as a trusted and automated build
inside the JBoss namespace: https://registry.hub.docker.com/repos/jboss/
- - Juca.
On 06/12/2014 04:44 PM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
So, I've uploaded the following images to my namespace on
Docker.
If those look good, I'll get them available on jboss' namespace
(jboss/keycloak, for instance).
https://hub.docker.com/u/jpkroehling/
keycloak-wildfly - Wildfly 8.1.0.Final + KC subsystem
keycloak (this should be the default one, hence the shorter name) -
"keycloak-wildfly" + Auth-server
keycloak-examples - "keycloak" + examples
Those can be tested with these commands:
$ docker run -it -p 8080:8080 jpkroehling/keycloak $ docker run -it
-p 8080:8080 jpkroehling/keycloak-wildfly $ docker run -it -p
8080:8080 jpkroehling/keycloak-examples
- Juca.
On 06/12/2014 03:16 PM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
>> keycloak (wildfly + auth server war + KC subsystem) -
>> keycloak-wildfly (wildfly + KC subsystem, no auth-server) -
>> keycloak-examples ("keycloak-full" image + examples)
> s/keycloak-full/keycloak/
>> What about the names? Do they match the expectation?
>> - Juca.
>> On 06/12/2014 02:52 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>>> On 6/12/2014 8:49 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 6/12/2014 2:16 AM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
>>>>> - - keycloak (wildfly + auth server war, no KC
>>>>> subsystem)
>>>> I would say no to this one. Eventually, the whole wildfly
>>>> instance will be secured by KC and we will need the
>>>> subsystem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'll add my -1 as well.
>> _______________________________________________ keycloak-user
>> mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> _______________________________________________ keycloak-user
> mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
_______________________________________________ keycloak-user
mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJToV+GAAoJEDnJtskdmzLMDi4H+wbj0/RMsfn7oKymvGp/Pr2j
PaAksS+AIyW2RX6kRRFQOijt31bc39L/8/02++FmQFDyM6t85B8aJcMu7rFBAt22
KTDJWqdRd27JteflvPu8JI8hkRIZZyBjEnzjWFfj50CQDzM3AXasQmFo4Zi/q4lZ
hQYnMga83Zv8o76JrJ08Srt+fA/ZOAuwvNTE5M7bzDPb1zYeU/hvOvUIHuYeHUjW
JJn/bfvfBvgpAIG8qTfYvae33TpXnyYvbbhIGVNrl4WdjRsrY2BVSgsoRcOuwz1P
uG6Tg+RwFqGnlpyUPFOGF32tFqeNSLjwQM8N7aLCtSexuSXJnBM5wNr7YrXZsQs=
=T0Ld
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
3848
days inactive
3854
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Bill Burke -
Juraci Paixão Kröhling -
Stan Silvert