On Dec 13, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/13/2013 10:21 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 09:51 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>> I am mainly viewing this from DeploymentInfo API aesthetics/usability
>> perspective.
> No point in continuing then, as aesthetics is completely subjective by
> definition, and thus all answers are equally "right" or "wrong";
> debating the finer points of API aesthetics is perhaps an amusing
> diversion but it is also a major time consumer.
>
> See also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson's_law_of_triviality
>
Sure - if Undertow is a project that caters to a small set of
integrators and expected to have
a very short shelf life, then yes, the discussion is pointless. But ...
as Tomcat and Jetty have shown,
Java based web containers have a long shelf life. API design becomes
paramount. :)
I want the API to be awesome too :) Note that Stuart is looking for feedback for
all of the Undertow APIs (not just this) before it goes final. This is our
one-and-only chance to get them right.
Hearing the top 10 API annoyances from everyone would be awesome!
--
Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat