Oh, I through that failureHandle would also get the Exchange completed, and
listenner be called ?
On Jan 12, 2017 11:23, "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas(a)redhat.com> wrote:
If there was a max queue size and the queue was full the request
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:07 PM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja(a)gmail.com>
> how the request was rejected ? by which criteria or event ?
> On Jan 12, 2017 03:13, "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas(a)redhat.com>
>> The exchange completion listener was added two early. If a request was
>> rejected then this would cause the count to go negative (as the count
>> would be decreased without ever having been increased).
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:12 AM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja(a)gmail.com>
>> > Hi all,
>> > I'd like to have understanding of what was going on with
>> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-349
, in which under some
>> > circumstance the io.undertow.server.handlers.RequestLimit got
>> > and
>> > could not process Queue correctly,
>> > probably someone could kindly explain me more ?
>> > btw. after digest below mailing list, I still could not figure out
>> > was
>> > wrong with RequestLimit (
>> > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/2014-
>> > )
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > undertow-dev mailing list
>> > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev