3:38 a.m.
Thanks for the suggestions Carter this is what I came up with let me know
if anything stands out as being incorrect. I was getting an error if I did
not call unDispatch and this seems to work.
*public* *void* handleRequest(HttpServerExchange exchange) *throws*
Exception {
Duration duration = durationFunc.apply(exchange);
*final* HttpHandler delegate;
*if* (exchange.isBlocking()) {
// We want to undispatch here so that we are not blocking
// a worker thread. We will spin on the IO thread using the
// built in executeAfter.
exchange.unDispatch();
delegate = *new* BlockingHandler(next);
} *else* {
delegate = next;
}
exchange.dispatch(exchange.getIoThread(), () -> {
exchange.getIoThread().executeAfter(() ->
Connectors.*executeRootHandler*(delegate, exchange),
duration.toMillis(),
TimeUnit.*MILLISECONDS*);
});
}
https://www.stubbornjava.com/posts/creating-a-non-blocking-delay-in-the-u...
Thanks,
Bill
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:33 AM Carter Kozak <c4kofony(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps some thing along these lines:
public void handleRequest(HttpServerExchange exchange) throws Exception {
exchange.dispatch(SameThreadExecutor.INSTANCE, () -> {
exchange.getIoThread().executeAfter(() ->
Connectors.executeRootHandler(handler, exchange),
duration, unit);
});
}
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 12:53 AM Bill O'Neil <bill(a)dartalley.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a way to add artificial latency to requests and I'm
having trouble finding a way that wouldn't require a blocking pool with 1
thread per request.
>
> What I would like to happen if possible.
>
> handler marks exchange as not ready (yield / pause)
> async runnable from another thread marks it ready to resume after some
time
> next iteration of IO loop catches that it is ready and actually executes
it now.
>
>
> public void handle(HttpServerExchange exchange) {
> if (firstExecution) {
> scheduledExec.schedule(() -> exchange.resume(), duration, unit);
> return;
> }
> next.handle(exchange);
> }
>
> Is something like this possible while staying on the IO threads the
whole time other than the ScheduledExecutorService? I was thinking of using
dispatch and dispatching back to the IO executor but I don't think that
will do what I intend.
>
> The end goal would be a way to handle N requests with various delays
built in to simulate latency without blocking connections. For instance if
the worker pool has 30 threads and I submit 100 requests with a 1 minute
delay followed by 1 request with a 10 second delay the final request should
come back first.
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
> _______________________________________________
> undertow-dev mailing list
> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
2011
days inactive
2011
days old
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Bill O'Neil