+1 Also if you see issues in the area of security without review let me
know and I can nominate someone ;-)
On 10/05/17 15:38, Brian Stansberry wrote:
Thanks, Darran.
My impression is the folks working on ladybird have been doing a good job of reviewing
the various PRs that went there. Please keep doing that now that the PRs are going
directly upstream, or we’ll quickly have a bottleneck.
Cheers,
Brian
> On May 10, 2017, at 6:08 AM, Darran Lofthouse <darran.lofthouse(a)jboss.com>
wrote:
>
> Everything that was merged to ladybird has now been merged upstream.
>
> We have a few PRs raised against ladybird that were not already merged -
> I am currently porting them over and resubmitting upstream so no action
> is required on those.
>
> Regards,
> Darran Lofthouse.
>
> On 03/05/17 17:44, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>> We have a number of PRs working there way through the queues now with
>> the latest component upgrades / backports from ladybird to upstream but
>> from this point on all pull requests should be sent directly upstream
>> instead of going via the ladybird branches.
>>
>> We still have some PRs against the incubator which we will continue to
>> merge and port over so those don't need to be resubmitted.
>>
>> We will keep the ladybird branches up to date with upstream in case we
>> need to use them again but for the last week or so the PRs coming
>> through have required less coordination so we should be able to handle
>> changes individually.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Darran Lofthouse.
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev