I think approximately yes, the vault was intended for storing passwords
then was used for storing other things as well, the credential store is the
evolution of the vault but is truly about passwords only. The next stage I
am proposing is a complete client side authentication policy which achieves
the pairing that went into the vault but also an awful lot more.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:51 PM Brian Stansberry <
Sorry for the slow reply.
This last post sounds quite a bit like the vault. But with an updated
API/SPI and a much richer possible set of behavior. And instead of using
expression resolution for access, which has the negative of making it
theoretically usable for pretty much any attribute, but with the system not
really knowing how it is being used, there is proper capability-based
integration. Is that a fair read on this?
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 7:16 AM Darran Lofthouse <
> Following on from my last e-mail this brings us to a follow on step for
> the users that are looking to externalise both their username and
> credential configuration together.
> Within the Elytron subsystem I can now add a new
> 'authentication-client-file' resource to load static definitions from file,
> as static definitions these will not be manageable. By using child
> resources however I can still hook these into capabilities to make them
> By loading from file we could also consider a couple of additional
> options such as encrypting the file, we could also consider bundling within
> a jar allowing other resources such as keytabs and certificates to be
> bundled with the configuration.
> After this stage we then have further possibilities to expand on this
> We could add a custom authentication-client resolver SPI to allow for
> custom resolvers, anyone who wants to resolve from custom locations could
> add their own implementation. In hosted environments such as OpenShift
> custom resolvers could be used to obtain authentication policies being
> managed elsewhere without relying on property expansion.
> Additionally by having all of this wrapped in an API we have the ability
> to add both auditing and authorization for anything accessing this
> configuration - something that is not possible in solutions that rely on
> expression expansion.
> Darran Lofthouse.
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018, 11:32 Darran Lofthouse <darran.lofthouse(a)redhat.com
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 1:34 AM Brian Stansberry <
>> brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 12:31 PM Martin Choma <mchoma(a)redhat.com>
>>>> A few thoughts:
>>>> Real Time Updates
>>>> - Runtime changes in era of OpenShift become less and less important
>>>> as configuration should be immutable. Runtime changes should be
>>>> addressed on OpenShift level. At least in past some of my "runtime
>>>> changes" issues were denied with this argument.
>>> This is certainly something to consider when considering any new
>>> management functionality.
>>> Another thing to consider is what services are going to utilize any
>>> real-time update? Are there many resources that respond to a credential
>>> attribute value change (e.g. write-attribute) without triggering
>>> reload-required? If they do trigger reload-required it seems likely
>>> because making a new value take effect was considered to be too difficult
>>> compared to the gain. In an immutable world the gain is likely even less.
>> Yes the real time updates could only ever be approached on a resource by
>> resource basis so existing resources (at least we have a finite set to
>> consider) would either need to already update real time password updates or
>> be retrospectively modified to support them - for the credential store the
>> best we can do it make this a possibility.
>>> - If this will be decided to accomplish I think it is enough when
>>>> updates take in action on explicit administrator command.
>>>> Support for Expressions
>>>> - Really question here is if vault wasn't misused as external
>>>> configuration storage for standalone.xml holding environment
>>>> properties on one place. Which could be more convenient as specifying
>>>> bunch of system properties. If so we should address this feature
>>>> separately - way to specify configuration property file for server
>>> I hope people aren't using a vault just for that. If you want to group
>>> together properties you can use bin/standalone.sh -P. On OpenShift you can
>>> mount a ConfigMap as a source of env var values, and env vars are used in
>>> expression resolution.
>>> I could imagine people sticking a username in a vault just because they
>>> put the password in the vault and administratively it was simpler to manage
>>> the two related values together. No idea if that's really done; I just
>>> imagine it. ;)
>> Rather than focusing on the management side of the credential store and
>> features like real time updates it feels to me that emphasis should be on
>> this username / password problem - any enhancements in this area having a
>> better chance for long term relevance.
>> As I have mentioned previously we know we have some resources that only
>> require a credential, such as unlocking a local KeyStore.
>> The username / password pairing is a common issue - we don't really have
>> a clean solution for this yet so would be a good area to focus.
>> However a number of newer authentication mechanisms have moved beyond
>> the traditional username / password combo, some need an alternative to a
>> password, some don't need a username at all. These also often have an
>> option to delegate the callers identity to the remote endpoint etc...
>> Better solving these last two would seem to be a better investment of
>> effort, regardless of how static future configurations do or do not become
>> this would still be relevant.
>> We already have the client side authentication context which provides a
>> very flexible configuration selection approach based on the endpoint being
>> connected to and additional information available as the connection is
>> requested. Whilst very flexible this does add a level of complexity in
>> understanding how the configuration is assembled and how mappings are
>> The next resource we have is the existing authentication-configuration,
>> this is effectively a single client side authentication policy for an
>> outbound connection.
>> I think from an end users perspective it is clearer to visualise a 1:1
>> relationship between the resource defining the outbound connection and the
>> resource defining the authentication policy. From a tooling perspective as
>> these are linked by capabilities a user doesn't even need to fully see the
>> separation, e.g. as you edited a datasource the console could offer an
>> option to edit the authentication-configuration which could open without
>> forcing the user to navigate to a different location in the model hierarchy.
>> We would need to look into more detail as to the suitability of this
>> resource and exactly how we would integrate it but this would generally be
>> my preferred starting point over trying to replicate expression expansion.
>>> - If purpose is to really treat different arguments as security
>>>> sensitive then proposed encryption/decryption way seems promising to
>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:22 PM Darran Lofthouse
>>>> <darran.lofthouse(a)jboss.com> wrote:
>>>> > During WildFly 15 and WildFly 16 I am looking at the next stages
>>>> credential store development based on a few feature requests we have not
>>>> handled yet.
>>>> > We are at the stage where this development is likely to affect
>>>> multiple areas of the application server, additionally we need to
>>>> these requests as a set so we don't take a decision for one that
>>>> us working on the remainder.
>>>> > I have put together a blog post describing some of the general
>>>> issues we want to look into: -
>>>> > Some of these changes will have an impact on any subsystem
>>>> referencing the credential store.
>>>> > Other changes we will need to decide if the solution lies within
>>>> WildFly Elytron, the management tier of the server, or the admin tools -
>>>> possibly a combination of all three.
>>>> > I am also going to share this link in the community forums to try
>>>> and obtain some additional feedback from end users.
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > Darran Lofthouse.
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > wildfly-dev mailing list
>>>> > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>> Brian Stansberry
>>> Manager, Senior Principal Software Engineer
>>> Red Hat
Manager, Senior Principal Software Engineer