I think the same George, can we continue this way ?
2012/12/7 <ggastald(a)redhat.com>
Hi Luca,
My opinion is barely the same. I think that tests with WebLogic should be
run manually. We could provide a profile, but we are only enabling it
manually or if the CI holds a licensed Weblogic instance for testing.
What are the other thoughts on this ?
On 12/07/2012 09:36 AM, Luca Masini wrote:
As suggested I wrote on Arquillian community and this is the response:
"The Arquillian WebLogic Container only depend on JavaEE libs compile
time, so we avoid the license issue there. But when it comes to
running/testing, you'll need a license.
So currently, the WebLogic container is only built(compiled/packaged) on
our CI. Community members that hold a license run the test suite manually.
I don't remember how the WebLogic developer license is, but the WebSphere
Developer license states things like: can not be used for testing, only
valid to the local developer computer, can not be placed as part of a build
server, etc etc.
Seemingly, you're not allowed to release code that requires container
libraries compile time based on those licenses. Even if compiled from the
local computer that has the license."
Is exactly our case. I would like to remember that, on contrary of
WebSphere, when I asked about license problem Oracle answered me that for
them is enough that we don't use WebLogic for a production site.
What to do now ?
--
****************************************
http://www.lucamasini.net
http://twitter.com/lmasini
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/luca-masini/7/10/2b9
****************************************
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing
listforge-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
--
*George Gastaldi* | *Senior Software Engineer*
JBoss Forge Team
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev