Hi Koen, You are not alone. :-( You may check this recent discussion: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/2012-March/001705.html Do you have the same problem? Regards, Ivan On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Koen Aers <koen.aers(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Some of you probably think: 'Here we go again' ;-) > > While working on FORGE-489 I had to extensively test on Windows as I had > to modify the startup scripts. I tested on Windows XP and Windows 7 and > found that, while Forge builds fine if the tests are skipped, doing 'mvn > clean install' fails while running the tests for the Parser/Java module in > both cases. Is this a known issue that I somehow missed? > > I also encountered some glitches while running on both those platforms. I > found that tab completion not always seems to work and that commands > sometimes are echoed. Anyone has the same experiences? > > Unless somebody tells me that I've overlooked something, I will file the > JIRA's with some more details tomorrow... > > Cheers, > Koen > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

Hi! My opinion on this (unfortunately didn't have the time to express it in the other thread): OK, we'll fix the test. But thus we'll just close our eyes. Here is why. An entity generated by Forge looks on Windows like this: package com.test.entity; // Some imports go here // below is the last import, and not only import java.lang.Override;@Entity public class Employee implements java.io.Serializable { Do you see how everything is on one line? It's ugly. And I believe that this happens just on Windows. And I think that the test makes sure that this is avoided. So if we "fix" the test to just pass, we'll keep living with this. Regards, Ivan On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Yes, we should definitely resolve this. I think by fixing the test case. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Hi Koen, You are not alone. :-( You may check this recent discussion: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/2012-March/001705.html Do you have the same problem? Regards, Ivan On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Koen Aers <koen.aers(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Some of you probably think: 'Here we go again' ;-) While working on FORGE-489 I had to extensively test on Windows as I had to modify the startup scripts. I tested on Windows XP and Windows 7 and found that, while Forge builds fine if the tests are skipped, doing 'mvn clean install' fails while running the tests for the Parser/Java module in both cases. Is this a known issue that I somehow missed? I also encountered some glitches while running on both those platforms. I found that tab completion not always seems to work and that commands sometimes are echoed. Anyone has the same experiences? Unless somebody tells me that I've overlooked something, I will file the JIRA's with some more details tomorrow... Cheers, Koen _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.org "Simpler is better." _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

I get the same ugliness in Linux as well (using 64-bit Fedora 15). Also, by implementing 'java.io.Serializable' instead of just 'Serializable', it means that the 'import java.io.Serializable' causes a warning, which should be very easy to avoid. On 03/20/2012 06:31 AM, Koen Aers wrote: Hi Ivan, The same ugliness can be admired also on OSX… But I believe I saw an issue for it. Cheers, Koen Op 20-mrt.-2012, om 10:23 heeft Ivan St. Ivanov het volgende geschreven: Hi! My opinion on this (unfortunately didn't have the time to express it in the other thread): OK, we'll fix the test. But thus we'll just close our eyes. Here is why. An entity generated by Forge looks on Windows like this: package com.test.entity; // Some imports go here // below is the last import, and not only import java.lang.Override;@Entity public class Employee implements java.io.Serializable { Do you see how everything is on one line? It's ugly. And I believe that this happens just on Windows. And I think that the test makes sure that this is avoided. So if we "fix" the test to just pass, we'll keep living with this. Regards, Ivan On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III < lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Yes, we should definitely resolve this. I think by fixing the test case. > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov < > ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Hi Koen, >> >> You are not alone. :-( >> >> You may check this recent discussion: >> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/2012-March/001705.html >> >> Do you have the same problem? >> >> Regards, >> Ivan >> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Koen Aers <koen.aers(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Some of you probably think: 'Here we go again' ;-) >>> >>> While working on FORGE-489 I had to extensively test on Windows as I >>> had to modify the startup scripts. I tested on Windows XP and Windows 7 and >>> found that, while Forge builds fine if the tests are skipped, doing 'mvn >>> clean install' fails while running the tests for the Parser/Java module in >>> both cases. Is this a known issue that I somehow missed? >>> >>> I also encountered some glitches while running on both those platforms. >>> I found that tab completion not always seems to work and that commands >>> sometimes are echoed. Anyone has the same experiences? >>> >>> Unless somebody tells me that I've overlooked something, I will file >>> the JIRA's with some more details tomorrow... >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Koen >>> _______________________________________________ >>> forge-dev mailing list >>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> forge-dev mailing list >> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >> >> > > > -- > Lincoln Baxter, III > http://ocpsoft.org > "Simpler is better." > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing listforge-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

Hi Lincoln, folks! I can take a look at the formatting issue. Cheers, Ivan On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III < lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Yeah. I've been meaning to check out that serialized thing for a while. > Regarding the formatting. Sounds like something we should fix. Proposals > welcome! > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ryan Bradley <rbradley(a)redhat.com&gt;wrote: > >> I get the same ugliness in Linux as well (using 64-bit Fedora 15). >> Also, by implementing 'java.io.Serializable' instead of just >> 'Serializable', it means that the 'import java.io.Serializable' causes a >> warning, which should be very easy to avoid. >> >> >> On 03/20/2012 06:31 AM, Koen Aers wrote: >> >> Hi Ivan, >> >> The same ugliness can be admired also on OSX… >> But I believe I saw an issue for it. >> >> Cheers, >> Koen >> >> Op 20-mrt.-2012, om 10:23 heeft Ivan St. Ivanov het volgende >> geschreven: >> >> Hi! >> >> My opinion on this (unfortunately didn't have the time to express it in >> the other thread): >> >> OK, we'll fix the test. But thus we'll just close our eyes. Here is >> why. >> >> An entity generated by Forge looks on Windows like this: >> >> package com.test.entity; >> // Some imports go here >> // below is the last import, and not only >> import java.lang.Override;@Entity public class Employee implements >> java.io.Serializable { >> >> Do you see how everything is on one line? It's ugly. And I believe >> that this happens just on Windows. And I think that the test makes sure >> that this is avoided. >> >> So if we "fix" the test to just pass, we'll keep living with this. >> >> Regards, >> Ivan >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III < >> lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Yes, we should definitely resolve this. I think by fixing the test >>> case. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov < >>> ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Koen, >>>> >>>> You are not alone. :-( >>>> >>>> You may check this recent discussion: >>>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/2012-March/001705.html >>>> >>>> Do you have the same problem? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ivan >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Koen Aers <koen.aers(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>>> >>>>> Some of you probably think: 'Here we go again' ;-) >>>>> >>>>> While working on FORGE-489 I had to extensively test on Windows as I >>>>> had to modify the startup scripts. I tested on Windows XP and Windows 7 and >>>>> found that, while Forge builds fine if the tests are skipped, doing 'mvn >>>>> clean install' fails while running the tests for the Parser/Java module in >>>>> both cases. Is this a known issue that I somehow missed? >>>>> >>>>> I also encountered some glitches while running on both those >>>>> platforms. I found that tab completion not always seems to work and that >>>>> commands sometimes are echoed. Anyone has the same experiences? >>>>> >>>>> Unless somebody tells me that I've overlooked something, I will file >>>>> the JIRA's with some more details tomorrow... >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Koen >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Lincoln Baxter, III >>> http://ocpsoft.org >>> "Simpler is better." >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> forge-dev mailing list >>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> forge-dev mailing list >> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> forge-dev mailing listforge-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> forge-dev mailing list >> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >> >> > > > -- > Lincoln Baxter, III > http://ocpsoft.org > "Simpler is better." > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev