I would favor a renaming to "Hawkular <Something>" if we had an idea for
a
name that encapsulate the 3 notions... (I don't). I agree that BTM is
confusing now.
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Gary Brown <gbrown(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi all
As discussed in the recent blog (and demo), Hawkular BTM now provides
Application Performance Management (APM), Distributed Tracing (DT) and
Business Transaction Management (BTM).
The project was initially started to address the third area, hence being
called BTM - however BTM requires the collection of the information used to
provide APM and DT - and providing those other views on the information is
useful to users.
Due to the wider scope, just wondering whether the BTM name is now
misleading. If a project component rename was considered a good idea, then
now would probably be the best time to do it, before getting close to a
stable 1.0 version?
So two questions:
1) Is a component rename a good idea?
2) If so, any suggestions for a name, either some generic term that
encapsulates APM, DT and BTM - or alternatively a completely unrelated name
(but then it would not follow the pattern used by other Hawkular
components).
Regards
Gary
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev