Hey, ManageIQ is using Ruby 2.2.4+ and Ruby 2.0 is pretty old now (Jruby 9.1.x is Ruby 2.3+), so I would like to no longer "support" Ruby 2.0. For the time being that only means that we do not test against 2.0 anymore in Travis. What do people think? What about 2.1 ? Heiko _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev

On Oct 7, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: no objection from me. On 10/7/2016 12:17 PM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote: Hey, ManageIQ is using Ruby 2.2.4+ and Ruby 2.0 is pretty old now (Jruby 9.1.x is Ruby 2.3+), so I would like to no longer "support" Ruby 2.0. For the time being that only means that we do not test against 2.0 anymore in Travis. What do people think? Yes! No need for these older versions. What about 2.1 ? Why stop there? Why not 2.2? Since current version is 2.3 (which ships in Red Hat Software Collections).

Heiko _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing listhawkular-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev

On Oct 7, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Heiko W.Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On 7 Oct 2016, at 20:04, Josejulio Martinez Magana wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, mike thompson <mithomps(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> Why stop there? Why not 2.2? Since current version is 2.3 As I wrote ManageIQ is on 2.2.4+ so it has to work with 2.2

_______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev