Re: [Hawkular-dev] open shift agent - what to call it?

+1 on the format and hawkular/hawkular-wildfly-agent (renaming sucks but we're still young enough to allow this) But we still need to decide betwen Openshift vs Kubernetes. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Heiko W.Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On 19 Oct 2016, at 15:24, John Mazzitelli wrote: > > > OK, so if we use Hawkular Kubernetes Agent then the gitrepo would be > named: > > > > hawkular/hawkular-kubernetes-agent > > Sounds good to me > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > > >