On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling <
jpkroehling(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 03.02.2016 12:25, Thomas Heute wrote:
> IMO going to Wildfly management tools to configure Hawkular is IMO not a
> great experience.
>
> IMO for Hawkular users, Wildfly is an internal detail and its complexity
> should be relatively hidden.
>
That's a valid point. The counter point, to me, is that if/when Hawkular
adds the possibility to manage this aspect of Wildfly (properties), we get
Hawkular support for free :) Hawkular managing itself!
If needed, yes but I don't see how one exclude the other one.
Thomas
- Juca.