Re: [Hawkular-dev] the name of our hawkular agent/wildfly monitor/feed is confusing - I'm fixing it

So does this mean the "feeds" in inventory should be renamed to "agents", too? I thought that we wanted to move away from using the word agent but frankly I don't care too much. On Monday, November 02, 2015 10:06:13 Thomas Heute wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:02 AM, John Mazzitelli <mazz(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > As I'm writing code and docs and javadocs all around, I realize that the > > name of our "agent" is utterly confused. We need to fix this or we will > > eventually confuse users/customers. > > > > Right now in code, or comments, or docs, or just in talking, the names of > > the "agent" have been at one time or another: > > > > agent > > wildfly monitor > > wildfly hawkular feed > > wildfly monitor agent > > wildfly extension > > wildfly agent module > > wildfly agent > > etc. etc. etc. > > > > Over the weekend, I'm going to start renaming this so it is consistent > > across the board. > > > > It will be called "Hawkular WildFly Agent" > > > > This will affect maven artifact names moving forward. But we need to fix > > this now, because its confusing ME. I can only imagine the confusion when > > people start to ask "what do you call the hawkular thing that monitors > > Wildfly?" > > _______________________________________________ > > hawkular-dev mailing list > > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev