This is maybe good and bad for us. It means that depending on a graph DB may be well supported in the future DSE Graph offering, but for now it would seem that Titan will not get much TLC past this point. So if we go with Titan we may need to be happy with what we see today. On 2/3/2015 9:58 AM, Stefan Negrea wrote: > Hello Everybody, > > Aurelius (the company behind Titan graph database) has been acquired by > DataStax (the main Cassandra developer company). > > Here are two articles around the web about the acquisition and strategic > direction: > > http://techcrunch.com/2015/02/03/datastax-plots-aurelius-graph-database-ac > quihire/ > http://www.zdnet.com/article/datastax-snaps-up-aurelius-and-its-titan-tea > m-to-build-new-graph-database/ > > > > Thank you, > Stefan Negrea > > Software Engineer > > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev

Hi, In my opinion we can still use the Blueprints API, because there are numerous implementations out there https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki including neo4j (gpl), Mongo, OrientDB and possibly jdbc as a fallback (or even start for mvp). If we pick something Blueprints compliant, we get the bunch of graph algorithms for free: https://github.com/tinkerpop/furnace/wiki To be clear, titan will be still open-source, but without core developers, I guess, they will give it to the apache incubator. more info about the situation here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/aureliusgraphs/WtU6om8CtqI and here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/aureliusgraphs/c07WEdH-epY jk _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev