On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Nick Boldt wrote:
Well, either this is a regression from when the
jboss.org Magnolia
pages when haywire
That could explain it.
or we never bothered to change this because we're not respinning
the old 3.0 and 3.1 sites anyway so what difference does it make if people are updating
from one never-to-be-updated site or another?
because a year later you or someone else will say "we didn't do it for the 3.0
and 3.1 sites so why do it for 3.3 and 3.4 etc." :)
/max
N
On 03/19/2012 10:39 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just came by
http://www.jboss.org/tools/download/stable/3_0_GA and noticed our
instructions still says:
>
> Rather than unpacking the zips below, you can install this release by pointing
Eclipse at
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/JBossTools-3.0.3.GA
>
> vs
>
> Rather than unpacking the zips below, you can install this release by pointing
Eclipse at
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/helios/
>
> ?
>
> Telling users to point to a fixed URL which never will see updates is wrong AFAIK and
I thought we extinguished those long time ago in public instructions ?
>
> /max
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com