Re: [jbosside-dev] Language used in package UI is ambigious/confusing
by Max Rydahl Andersen
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:56:04 +0100, Rob Stryker <rstryker(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> archive is fine, but i see this as low priority for the upcoming
> release. Fixing bugs is much more important right now than naming.
Sure lets not delay the release further - bugfixes is priority 1; but its
important one usability wise
and I guess the API should also be changed or ?
/max
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Rydahl Andersen"
> <max.andersen(a)redhat.com>
> To: <jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:30 AM
> Subject: [jbosside-dev] Language used in package UI is
> ambigious/confusing
>
>
>>
>> I created this isssue a couple of days ago:
>> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-448
>>
>> I'm not a native speaker myself, but I do believe that "Package" is too
>> ambigious to use
>> as the name for what the *Packaging* plugin produces.
>>
>> Could we get some feedback from you guys since the current ui/languague
>> confuses more than
>> it explains...and that is not good.
>>
>> My suggestion is to use Archive for the thing that is produced by the
>> Packaging (or even "Archive packaging") builder.
>>
>> -- --
>> Max Rydahl Andersen
>> callto://max.rydahl.andersen
>>
>> Hibernate
>> max(a)hibernate.org
>> http://hibernate.org
>>
>> JBoss a division of Red Hat
>> max.andersen(a)jboss.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosside-dev mailing list
>> jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosside-dev
>>
>
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
max(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
JBoss a division of Red Hat
max.andersen(a)jboss.com
17 years, 7 months
[jbosside-dev] Language used in package UI is ambigious/confusing
by Max Rydahl Andersen
I created this isssue a couple of days ago:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-448
I'm not a native speaker myself, but I do believe that "Package" is too
ambigious to use
as the name for what the *Packaging* plugin produces.
Could we get some feedback from you guys since the current ui/languague
confuses more than
it explains...and that is not good.
My suggestion is to use Archive for the thing that is produced by the
Packaging (or even "Archive packaging") builder.
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
max(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
JBoss a division of Red Hat
max.andersen(a)jboss.com
17 years, 7 months