To elaborate, here's an example: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-bpel/blob/master/pom.xml If you had these projects checked out: ~/jbt41/jbosstools-bpel ~/jbt41/jbosstools-server ~/jbt41/jbosstools-base you could run a build of bpel + server + base like this: However, if you run the tycho-versions plugin to bump your plugins/features to a newer version, it will (currently) try to also upversion everything in server and base, even if you only meant bpel. org.sonatype.tycho:tycho-versions-plugin:set-version -DnewVersion=4.5.6-SNAPSHOT --- So, since they're in conflict, we're wondering which usecase is more important -- using the tycho-versions plugin, or using the bootstrap profile. Cheers, Nick On 01/30/2013 11:55 AM, Mickael Istria wrote: -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com

On 02/06/2013 04:31 PM, Mickael Istria wrote: I submitted pull requests to remove bootstrap profile from all components, except VPE which requires more investigation for BrowserSim. Please process them ASAP, ideally before Alpha1 gets branched. Cheers -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools> My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>