Endorsed. 'Recommended' means weaselling out.
On 2012-09-06, at 5:57 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Legal have approved the badge, but would prefer we don't use
supported.
They are happy with recommended or endorsed.
Endorsed works well for my British English brain, but does it work for other versions of
English?
On 3 Sep 2012, at 14:26, Pete Muir wrote:
> As no one has more comments, we'll go with the bottom left.
>
> I'll work with legal on the wording.
>
> On 30 Aug 2012, at 14:18, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>> Here it is on white :-)
>>
>> <JDFApproved4_white_bg.jpg>
>>
>> On 29 Aug 2012, at 13:03, Sande Gilda wrote:
>>
>>> I like the bottom left too. I like keeping it in sync with the look and feel
of the web site. I wonder how it would look on a white background though. Does it need a
boundary?
>>>
>>> Not sure about the supported either. :-)
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: "Marius Bogoevici" <mariusb(a)redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:58:04 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> James P has started to develop some designs for this:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I really like the bottom left (though it's possible that supported
is
>>>> not the right term, perhaps "Recommended" or
"Certified" is better?)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:08, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Exactly why I like Jason's proposal of using the JDF logo
explicitly.
>>>>
>>>> On 2012-07-10, at 11:07 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well we want to rate them based on their level of affiliation, not on
>>>> their quality or difficulty.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:04, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Something based on the JDF logo would be better. I don't think we
>>>> want to *rate* examples, we just want to indicate their degree of
>>>> affiliation with jdf.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2012-07-10, at 10:25 AM, Jason Porter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What about rendering the jdf "logo" as a stamp? with some specs
on it
>>>> or ink areas missing?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: "Pete Muir" < pmuir(a)redhat.com >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To: "Jonathan Fuerth" < jfuerth(a)redhat.com >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cc: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:53:37 AM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That could work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll see if I can do some mockups.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 14:50, Jonathan Fuerth wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A gold starburst "Official Supported JBoss Demo" would convey
this
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> idea to me. Kind of like the Nintendo Seal of Quality.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As for the lesser-supported scenarios, I'm not sure we need a mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> for that. The absence of the official seal might be enough.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Or, if the supported demos get an Official Seal, maybe the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> in-the-works demos could get the industrious Soon-to-be-official
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Beaver of Quality, and the unsupported demos could get the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> completely unofficial Otter of Quality. (ha, ha, ha.. OK, I'll
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> stop now.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Jonathan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: "Pete Muir" < pmuir(a)redhat.com >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:08:45 AM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We need a visual metaphor that quickly conveys to people that an
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> example is:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * official, and something we will stand by, answer questions on,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> support in a product (e.g. TicketMonster)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * something that we plan to add to as an official example later on
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (e.g. jbossworld keynote 2012)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * something that is really interesting, but is unlikely to be
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> official (e.g. Vineet's example)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We had thought about using ski run colours (green circle, blue
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> square, black diamond) to indicate the level, but they really
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> refer more to difficulty than to recommendation. Anyone got any
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> good ideas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pete
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev