Ratified and Sanctioned are interesting, not sure if we'd want to use them, but they
sound nice :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sande Gilda" <sgilda(a)redhat.com>
To: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Jason Porter" <jporter(a)redhat.com>, jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 8:40:32 AM
Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
Does anything here sound good?
http://thesaurus.com/browse/endorsed?s=t
On 08/30/2012 09:37 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
> Supported is a massively overloaded word ;-)
>
> On 29 Aug 2012, at 22:56, Jason Porter wrote:
>
>> Endorsed to me means something slightly different than supported.
>> Supported to me would be either we created or we test and can fix
>> it if something goes wrong. Endorsed would be we've gone through
>> it and approve of everything in there, but we're not "offering
>> support" for it. I would use "endorsed" for community
contributed
>> things (examples, guides, etc) and supported for things we
>> authored internally or have taken over the ownership.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:41:22 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>>>
>>> I like Endorsed
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> On 29 Aug 2012, at 13:03, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> we actually have the exact same challenge in tooling land - the
>>>> trouble of classifying what "status"
>>>> an external plugin has for us/users.
>>>>
>>>> We currently use the term "Certified" and "Selected"
as the way
>>>> to
>>>> say which we support/can help fix things on and "selected"
being
>>>> those
>>>> we at least tested at some point but might have changed since
>>>> then.
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>> On 29 Aug 2012, at 13:58, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> James P has started to develop some designs for this:
>>>>>
>>>>> <JDFApproved3.jpg>
>>>>>
>>>>> I really like the bottom left (though it's possible that
>>>>> supported
>>>>> is not the right term, perhaps "Recommended" or
"Certified" is
>>>>> better?)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:08, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly why I like Jason's proposal of using the JDF logo
>>>>>> explicitly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2012-07-10, at 11:07 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well we want to rate them based on their level of
>>>>>>> affiliation,
>>>>>>> not on their quality or difficulty.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:04, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Something based on the JDF logo would be better. I
don't
>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>> we want to *rate* examples, we just want to indicate
their
>>>>>>>> degree of affiliation with jdf.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2012-07-10, at 10:25 AM, Jason Porter wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What about rendering the jdf "logo" as a
stamp? with some
>>>>>>>>> specs on it or ink areas missing?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>> From: "Pete Muir"
<pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> To: "Jonathan Fuerth"
<jfuerth(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:53:37 AM
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual)
metaphor
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That could work.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll see if I can do some mockups.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 14:50, Jonathan Fuerth
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A gold starburst "Official Supported
JBoss Demo" would
>>>>>>>>>>> convey this
>>>>>>>>>>> idea to me. Kind of like the Nintendo Seal
of Quality.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As for the lesser-supported scenarios,
I'm not sure we
>>>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>> a mark
>>>>>>>>>>> for that. The absence of the official seal
might be
>>>>>>>>>>> enough.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Or, if the supported demos get an Official
Seal, maybe
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> in-the-works demos could get the
industrious
>>>>>>>>>>> Soon-to-be-official
>>>>>>>>>>> Beaver of Quality, and the unsupported demos
could get
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> completely unofficial Otter of Quality. (ha,
ha, ha.. OK,
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>>>>>>> stop now.)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Jonathan
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Pete Muir"
<pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> To: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:08:45 AM
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual)
metaphor
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We need a visual metaphor that quickly
conveys to people
>>>>>>>>>>> that an
>>>>>>>>>>> example is:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> * official, and something we will stand by,
answer
>>>>>>>>>>> questions
>>>>>>>>>>> on,
>>>>>>>>>>> support in a product (e.g. TicketMonster)
>>>>>>>>>>> * something that we plan to add to as an
official example
>>>>>>>>>>> later on
>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g. jbossworld keynote 2012)
>>>>>>>>>>> * something that is really interesting, but
is unlikely
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> official (e.g. Vineet's example)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We had thought about using ski run colours
(green circle,
>>>>>>>>>>> blue
>>>>>>>>>>> square, black diamond) to indicate the
level, but they
>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>> refer more to difficulty than to
recommendation. Anyone
>>>>>>>>>>> got
>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>> good ideas?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Pete
>>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev